Hillary Unmasked

How Does Hillary Feel About This?

2008-04-22T10:46:00.000-07:00

Attacks

2008-03-26T15:49:00.000-07:00

I firmly believe that Hillary Clinton will bury this country, and I love the bitter attacks between her and Obama. Knowing that both of the Democratic presidential candidates would destroy the remaining liberties we have as citizens, liberals' present choice is between a man with little experience and strong anti-American ties, or a woman who "misspeaks" and lies. In all honesty, these are probably the least of their concerns, but these issues are forefront in the media, so that is what people are thinking about now.

Soon, Barack Obama will have all of his dirty secrets drug out, even worse than his relationship and shared ideas with close friend and vocal backer Rev. Wright. And of course Hillary Clinton's lack of executive experience, shady cover-ups and mysterious deaths associated with her family will be unearthed again. As frustrating and difficult as this may be for some, especially the candidates...I say...Let the good times roll!

Congratulations Hillary!

2008-03-05T21:49:00.000-08:00

Congrats on your success with Super Tuesday II! I suppose now is when the claws really come out, mostly towards Obama, but also towards McCain. I am truly excited to see how things proceed over the next couple of weeks, and just how vicious things will get. I am happy that Hillary Clinton is revived and still in the race, I just hope nobody gets hurt here. Of course, many of those skeletons (at least in the Clinton closet) were buried when her husband ran for president.

I do wish Obama luck through this battle, though he is completely undeserving of the position for which he is running, but so is Hillary. I am looking for someone with experience, and I just haven't found that candidate yet. If any of you can recommend someone, please let me know.

Hillary's Depressing Drop

2008-02-27T22:16:00.000-08:00

I do honestly wish that I could be a part of the Clinton Campaign to know how this Obama flux is effecting her personally. I am not critical of how she is campaigning (at least, not at this point), simply how she might be handling her current drop in the polls. Is it Bill's fault? Is it her likability? Is it her gender? Well, who cares? Maybe everybody is just now starting to realize that she is not qualified to lead the greatest country in the world. Granted, neither is Obama.

I will venture to say that she is probably writhing with anger and frustration, and probably soon a defeat. This is going to be a very important and frustrating week for the left-wing extremists as they wait to find who they are droned to follow. And I have no doubt that any of these drones will have a problem with who the "choice" is, as long as they replace a Republican president. Ignorant dronism, but I suppose I can go into that on a different blog.

Super Tuesday

2008-02-06T22:45:00.000-08:00

So Hillary made it through Super Tuesday, was anyone surprised? Yes, Obama still did well in places, but that will not stop the Clinton-engine-that-would. Even if Obama has the support of the masses, Hillary has masses of henchmen. There very well may be a Clinton-Obama ticket, people seem to like him and fear her. Isn't that how the mafia works? Hitmen, pay-offs, posterboys...yeah, that sounds right.

Neither candidate has the defense experience to lead us out of the Middle East succesfully, neither has had long enough experience in the government to get the things we really need, and neither has the real experience in the economy to thwart whatever "disasters" may be coming. What exactly do either of these candidates have experience with? Is is worthy of leading our country?

Can Bill be Harnessed?

2008-01-24T21:13:00.000-08:00

I cannot help but add my own remarks about former President Bill Clinton, since everybody else seems to be commenting on his catty, some believe inappropriate, campaigning. So he attacks Obama, of course...he bickers with reporters, yeah. What I don't understand is why people find this odd. If he was going to act regal and appropriate, wouldn't he have acted like that in the oval office? Why does anyone expect this decent behavior now? In my opinion (which even my own father disagrees with), this is one of the reasons why spouses of former presidents should not be allowed to run for president. The people who support Bill Clinton, will listen to what he says now. It will not matter that his wife is even less qualified than him to lead the free world. He said it, it must be so. The Clinton-lemmings will use this rationale.

Yes, many people are criticising Bill because they want the Clinton slew to make way for Obama. These are the people who think it is more important to elect the first black president, rather than the first female president. Of course, my main bone to pick with these people is that they should pick the most qualified person for the job, not simply to try and achieve some new quota or establish presidential affirmative action.

In my opinion, the reasons Bill is out there so hard for Hill are selfish, not patriotic or supportive. He wants the prestige, he wants the money, and most importantly, he wants to be able to sleep with the most powerful woman in the world...good luck Bill, isn't she celibate?

Hillary made a funny

2008-01-17T18:48:00.000-08:00

I hope that she felt like an idiot after this little display, because that is what she looked like. She is just too mechanical and impersonal to try and soften her edges in this way. Most people will not forget her true persona, but sadly, many are not smart enough to swish away these terrible attempts to chicken-soup her image. If her acting were a little better and her desperation to be more human a little less pathetic, perhaps even cynics like myself would fall for a few of these far-reaching antics. But, I don't think that is going to happen any time soon.

Iowa Caucuses

2008-01-03T21:30:00.000-08:00

Did Hillary cry when she first heard that she was the third choice as Democratic presidential candidate in Iowa? What a sight that would be! But no, friends...I am sure she did not. She probably just punched the person standing nest to her, and then went on to punish her husband for inadequate support.

In all likelihood, she will probably still win the overall nomination, unfortunately. Though I do not agree with Obama's inexperience, I absolutely cannot stand the Clinton corruption. Oh, how I would have loved to be a fly on the wall when the Clinton camp got this news! But I will have to accept the images in my mind, because it seems like the news, or at least MSNBC, is throwing out a pillow for Clinton to land on. She has been getting bowed down to by the Chris Matthews crowd.

I would love to see the rest of the country show similar results to Iowa, and tell the world just how unlikeable Hillary Clinton is. She is corrupt, deceitful and abrasive...let's push that!

Hillary Clinton: An Unfair Advantage

2007-10-16T23:18:00.000-07:00

I'm not sure how many people are going to say this after all of the headlines today but....how many other presidential candidates would be welcome on The View tomorrow? Probably none. Voting for Hillary because she is a woman is about as stupid as watching CNN to get an unbiased view of the news.

She was on the woman's show to try and woo homemakers and those more feminine voters (who probably can't think for themselves) while trying to portray a less masculine image. None of the other presidential candidates, certainly none of the conservative candidates, would be welcome on the show to pathetically pander as Hillary has done.

Should we give her "quota" points simply because she is a female? HELL NO!!! She has done nothing to promote women's rights other than encouraging manipulation, perjury and murder to conceal a dissatisfied husband's infidelity.

Once again...thanks, but no thanks. We would find a better president in the rat that scratches around in my garage than in Hillary Clinton.

Another Ad From Clinton

2007-10-04T22:27:00.000-07:00

If VP Cheney is Darth Vader, Who is Hillary Clinton?

2007-09-21T21:42:00.000-07:00

Hillary would clearly be the Sarlacc in the Great Pit of Carkoon (the sand pit that eats Jaba the Hut's victims in Return of the Jedi). If this is some sort of joke, it is a very poor one. Either she is trying to win over Star Wars geeks (like myself) or she is just an idiot. At least Darth Vader was a good guy in his youth (as Anakin Skywalker), and in the end when he killed Emperor Palpatine. Has she ever been "good"?

What a moron. I can't decide what pisses me off more, a statement like this or her pandering southern accent.

HillaryCare: Part Deux

2007-09-18T21:58:00.000-07:00

Here are a few details on Hillary's new universal health care plan. My first problem is with "requiring" people to be insured. What will happen to those who don't want insurance? One thing that most Americans have in common is that they don't want to be forced to do anything.

I think that it is blatantly obvious that our country cannot afford universal health care and that her proposed budget for it cannot work. I would rather hear her detailed plan on saving Social Security, before she adds to the benefits of being American. I am very sympathetic to those who are uninsured, especially those who really need coverage. I have been without health care with Type 1 diabetes, it is not easy. Sacrifices and changes must be made, but I would not ask for everyone else to pay for my problems. There are entirely too many people who do not want to pay for the rest of the country's health care. If Hillary is elected, this plan will implode. So keep on researching, maybe in 15 more years she will have the right answer.

Hillary's View on Outsourcing

2007-09-15T22:49:00.000-07:00

In her pursuit of money and power, Hillary has traded favors for funds with an Indian constituency, who have pledged to raise around $5 million for her 2008 presidential run. The Clintons (during their eight years in office) approved grants to Indian-American advocacy groups which were used to outsource jobs from the U.S. to India, and more recently Sen. Clinton has backed raising the cap for annual visas from the current 65,000 to 115,000.

These conflicting statements and seemingly un-American views have delayed her obtaining an endorsement that would normally be given unquestionably and without hesitation to the front running Democrat. But Labour unions are withholding their endorsements until she can give a clear position on outsourcing.

Though Clinton prides herself (or at least her image) on being for the American people and providing them with jobs and services, she said in 2005 in New Delhi, "There is no way to legislate against reality. Outsourcing will continue... We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences." So, she is going to provide universal healthcare, preschool, affordable higher education, a cure for cancer and a slew of other things (which will either never happen or destroy our country when put into place), but she can't do anything about keeping American jobs for Americans, in America. Its amazing the things she can and cannot do!

Her conflicting opinions were displayed earlier this year when she told students in New Hampshire that she hated "seeing US telemarketing jobs done in remote locations far, far from our shores."

Whatever happened to the days when politicians said they were either for or against something and just stuck with it?

Giuliani Challenges Clinton

2007-09-14T21:11:00.000-07:00

In a new ad released to FoxNews, Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani recaps Hillary Clinton's shifting positions on Iraq and charges her to condemn the MoveOn.org ad belittling Gen. Petraeus. Though Sen. Clinton has said little on these events, other than calling Gen. Petraeus a liar, perhaps this will spring her to action.

Will she openly condemn the ad? I doubt it. We are more likely to see her go the other way. But another, and possibly more achievable goal has been achieved with this ad....the gloves are off. They are both party front runners and both from New York, or at least representing New York. (Hillary is about as much of a New Yorker as I am!) Sen. Clinton will either stay silent until she concocts the a reasonably liberal retort, or she will lash out at Giuliani. So we shall wait on the edge of our seats to see how gracefully Hillary will absorb this blow, but I sure wouldn't mind seeing her implode.

Clinton Campaign to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu

2007-09-13T21:34:00.000-07:00

This FoxNews video claims that the Hillary Camp. had been warned of the corruption of Norman Hsu, but the Clintons are not ones to pass judgement on corrupt individuals. Hsu is the norm to them, not an exception. But now Hillary's campaign will be returning $850,000 raised from individual donors by Hsu.

The Clinton '08 campaign has said that after returning these donations, they "will accept their contributions and ask them to confirm for the (campaign's) records that they are form their own personal funds." Of course Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson also said that "the campaign will vigorously review its fundraisers, including thorough criminal background checks, in the future." (click here to see article)

I just can't wait to see how many of these original donors actually re-give their gifts to the corrupt Clinton machine.

Hillary's Letter to President Bush

2007-09-12T21:23:00.000-07:00

Dear Mr. President:

As you prepare to address the nation tomorrow, I write to request that you seize the opportunity and offer the American people a candid assessment of the challenges that we continue to face in Iraq and offer a change in course to your failing strategy.

Over the past two days, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker have testified before Congress about the current situation in Iraq. General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker both have long and distinguished careers in service to our nation and in their testimony, they tried to put the best possible face on the difficult situation that we confront in Iraq.

In their testimony, however, General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker could not mask the fact that the ostensible goal for increasing U.S. troops in Iraq earlier this year - to create the "space" for Iraqi political reconciliation - has not been met. And indeed, serious concerns have been raised about many of the metrics cited by General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker in support of their assertion that progress is being made in Iraq.

General Petraeus testified that he has proposed a decrease of five combat brigades in Iraq by July/August 2008 and press reports have suggested that you plan to announce your acceptance of this recommendation when you address the nation tomorrow evening. However, if completed, these troop reductions would merely bring troop levels in Iraq back to the levels before you announced the "surge" in January of this year. Moreover, as was discussed during General Petraeus's testimony, troop levels in Iraq must decrease by this amount in order to avoid extending Army deployments beyond 15 months and straining our military even further.

What you are planning to tell the American people tomorrow night is that one year from now, there will be the same number of troops in Iraq as there were one year ago. Mr. President, that is simply too little too late, and unacceptable to this Congress, and to the American people who have made clear their strong desire to bring our troops home, and end this war.

As Commander-in-Chief you have the authority and ability to greatly accelerate the redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq, and to bring so many more troops home so much faster. I strongly urge you to choose this course of action.

Mr. President, it has been nearly four and a half years since you landed on an aircraft carrier and stood before the American people under a banner that read "Mission Accomplished." Do not repeat that mistake on Thursday night. Do not misrepresent the facts about the situation on the ground. And do not portray an unavoidable reduction in U.S. troops to pre-surge levels that would occur anyway as a marker of success. Be candid with the American people. They deserve it.

Thank you for your consideration

Sincerely yours,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

This is Hillary's letter, posted today to President Bush, on her presidential campaign website. My first suggestion to Hillary would be, don't speak for the troops, you have no idea what they want, or what they are going through. Leave it to the people who have experience and know what the hell is going on over there to decide how to complete the mission. DO NOT call them liars!

My personal statement to Sen. Clinton is that there are a lot of troops (though she does not know of any) that welcome an extended assignment in Iraq. They know the benefits of succeeding over there; they don't want to have to go back, or to fight them here in two years time. And, this might be a more personal issue, but many of them, even those who aren't sure what the hell is going on, welcome the pay raise for working over there.

Long story short...get some real experience before you try and change the policy or attempt to discredit those who try to inform you.

Hillary Clinton Lacks Resolve After General Petraeus Speaks to Congress

2007-09-11T22:28:00.000-07:00

As should be expected, Sen. Clinton made a squishy response to Gen. David Petraeus's testimony yesterday. Most Democrats have come out with crazy left-wing remarks (such as, "Gen. Betray-us"-- which is disgusting), but not the pandering Hillary. In campaign mode she fails to take a firm position. In Boca Raton, FL yesterday she said,

"Our troops who have performed heroically and have done everything they've been asked to do in Iraq have no business refereeing an Iraqi civil war. It is up to the Iraqis to make the decisions as to how they will stabilize their own country...But I honestly believe that if the troops come out tomorrow, next year, five years or 10 years, because there is no military solution, if the Iraqis have not resolved their own internal problems, there is nothing we can do."

Though most of us informed citizens know that Hillary Clinton is as far left as Sean Penn, she continues to shift like a bowling ball on a pirate ship when it comes to Iraq. She is hesitant to condemn the noble work of our men in uniform because she does not want to be viewed as unpatriotic, not because she doesn't actually want to condemn it. I can only hope that her lack of stability on such issues will lose her the support of the "hug-a-Taliban" crazies from MoveOn.org and DailyKos.

For the people I know who have fought in Iraq, it would be an incredible and insulting mistake to put a waffler like Hillary in charge. Her statement shows her disregard for America's future and her inability to lead the greatest country in the world.

Clinton Fundraising Fugitive Picked up in Colorado

2007-09-08T21:54:00.000-07:00

Major Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu was picked up in Colorado yesterday, and is expected to be extradited back to California to face his original 1992 fraud conviction, as well as his more recent unlawful flight charge. What a moron.

Don't worry Hill, he'll be back in time to raise you a few million more!

Hillary's Thoughts on Bin Laden

2007-09-07T22:29:00.000-07:00

What are Hillary's thoughts on this most recent tape of Osama Bin Laden? Will this sway her opinion on Iraq once more? We all know that much less significant things have changed her position in the past.

So far she is ignoring that it even exists, most likely waiting for the official "It really is Bin Laden" stamp before she makes an official statement. That way she has time to research all angles on what she thinks people want to hear, instead of actually forming and expressing her own true feelings on the matter.

At least Thompson, though a recent arrival to the 2008 Presidential race, has given his feeling of this news on his website. So far, nothing from Hillary. If you have heard her reaction, please let me know!

Hillary's New Hampshire Ad

2007-09-06T21:25:00.000-07:00

Here is Hillary's latest ad, which sounds like more of the same..."I've got the experience...I'm going to get us out of Iraq, get better benefits for veterans, energy independence and universal healthcare." Yes, she would make all of this happen and we would not see more than 30% of our paychecks, and our economy and world standing will collapse.

Since I know that she will not be able to do any of this, let alone breathe in the White House, without raising taxes, I would like to see a detailed plan of how she will make this happen. The introduction of the ad says that she has spent her life fighting for all of these things and all of the American people. I was under the impression that she had spent her life covering for her husband and manipulating their actions to benefit herself, I've never heard anything about her helping the rest of us. I can't wait to see her continue to try convince America that she cares as much as she says.

Hillary Clinton's Fugitive Fundraiser

2007-09-05T21:39:00.000-07:00

Major "HillRaiser" Norman Hsu is again a wanted fugitive after skipping his court hearing today. Though he posted $2 million bail last week, he is off again just like he was in 1991 when facing the original grand theft charges. Nobody knows where Hsu has fled to, though we can all guess he is in China, or perhaps Hillary Clinton's basement. But Hillary says she knew nothing about her great HillRaiser's criminal past. It is odd that she has accepted such large contributions without getting any history of the person giving them. Either she is lying, or she is incompetent.

Let's first get this straight, Hsu did not infiltrate the Clinton lair to make her campaign look bad. These are the type of people who surround the Clintons. It is that simple. She is clumsily back-peddling from her association with Hsu by returning $23,000 she had collected from him for her presidential and senatorial campaigns, and HillPac (Hillary's political action committee).

There is something deeper and far more sinister to this relationship that will probably come out in the end, unless Hillary has her way, she has always been aggressive when it comes to covering up scandals. This is certainly not the first fundraising scandal Hillary Clinton has been caught up in, and it will not be the last. There is not a strand of moral fiber in this candidate's body.

Hillary Clinton on Gonzales Resignation

2007-08-28T20:37:00.000-07:00

Upon Alberto Gonzales resignation yesterday, Hillary Clinton released her public statement. As she starts to lose her composure, this video shows Hillary's unbalanced and irrational behavior. This, along with many others urging for Gonzales's removal, solidifies my belief in their replacement of common sense with biased and charlatan principles.

In her press release she mentions Gonzales betraying his obligations and the trust of the American people. She does not mention her husband's firing of all 93 US Attorneys, but because Alberto Gonzales accepted resignations from only a fraction of that amount, he is partisan and unconstitutional. I won't even begin to preach about Bill and Hillary Clinton's shared presidency and its lacking of trust of the American people, that would be a novel.

For anybody who cares to do a little research, or simply switch on their memory button they will see that Hillary's statements are absurdly hypocritical.

The final statement from Clinton's press release is one that I find particularly senseless is:

"The second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is one more reminder that the President must appoint someone to lead the Department of Justice with the leadership and competence necessary to defend the Constitution."

What exactly is she trying to say here? Is this more manipulation of voters emotions? Probably. This definitely gets my "Huh?!" award.

Would Another Terrorist Attack Help the GOP?

2007-08-24T22:45:00.001-07:00

Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton told a New Hampshire crowd on Thursday that, "If certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world. So I think I'm the best of the Democrats to deal with that." Check out this CNN article for more information.

Other Democrats have come out condemning Hillary's statement, being as it lacked tact, style and minimal intelligence. Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd Friday said, "Frankly, I find it tasteless to discuss political implications when talking about a potential terrorist attack on the United States." This ploy of hers does not surprise me in the least, being as she regularly throws low-blows and makes insensitive statements either before fully thinking them through, or just not caring what people will think when she says them. What I cannot understand is why she would keep putting her foot in her mouth like this, I thought that she was leaving that up to Obama.

The truth is, the GOP would only benefit from another terrorist attack because Americans feel safer and more confident in their leadership and resolve, especially when it comes to defense. Does that mean that any of the Republican candidates would like another attack to boost their position for the upcoming election? Absolutely not. This angle of Sen. Clinton's is despicable. Of course, the far left will continue to fall at her feet, but at least the moderates are taking a step back from the Hillary bandwagon for now. I am sure that they will return to her, but if she keeps on making stupid remarks like this, her support will thin out.

Let us all remember that terrorism is not a political tool to be employed for maximum impact on voters. It is a reality, and a dangerous threat throughout the world.

Toy Safety for Children

2007-08-22T14:59:00.000-07:00

After 39 toy recalls this year, Hillary Clinton posted a press release about how she will keep American children from getting dangerous toys when she is president. All of these toys were imported from China, who produces most of the world's toys and about 80% of the toys in the United States alone. Clinton also tried putting some of the blame on President Bush, jabbing at his nominees for the Chair of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Call me crazy, but I never blamed Bush for bringing defective toys into the country, unlike the manipulative Clinton campaign.

This statement from the Clinton camp sounds like another major inflation of bureaucracy and taxes. Which once again makes me wonder how she is going to relieve the middle class of our great tax-burden. Yes, taxes will go up for us too, not just the wealthy. If elected President, Hillary has pledged to double the CPSC's budget, as well as additional expenditures to "overhaul" their testing facility. How often has injecting a government agency with steroids ever increased efficiency?

There should be further precautions preventing importation of dangerous and/or deadly toys, but perhaps we should start by re-examining our trade relations with China, since they have sent us harmful toys, children's products, poisoned toothpaste and pet food. Before pumping more money at the problem, let's stop it at the source or cut the defective source off altogether.

Hillary vs. Karl

2007-08-21T21:28:00.000-07:00

Since announcing that he will be stepping down at the end of the month, Karl Rove has publicly challenged Hillary Clinton's stance on different issues and her presidential campaign. Rove believes that Hillary will be the Democrat's nominee and stated that the public opinion of her is negative. For related articles click here.

Hillary says that Karl Rove is "obsessed" with her, and that she knows how to beat the "Republican attack machine." These retorts sound spiteful and unoriginal, much like a teenage spat. These comments will only solidify people's doubts about electing an emotional, bitter, possibly hormonal and definitely irrational woman. She is ridiculous.

Her website even came out with a public argument, in the form of a press release, engaging Rove and attempting to discount his talking points with poll results. Shouldn't a presidential candidate be above this sort of scuffle. After all, when putting yourself in the largest spotlight in the world, aren't all challenges and attacks on the table?

This shows great weakness in Hillary Clinton, and her campaign controllers. As this personal debate heats up, we will see the darker side of Hillary more and more. Hillary shall be unmasked.

Hillary: A Day in Nurse's Shoes

2007-08-18T21:04:00.000-07:00

Hillary is trying to give herself a more personable image, which is quite a stretch. Though, I have to admit, her people are doing a decent job of making her look like a real person, not the heartless cyborg she really is. This video was posted on her website and YouTube to try and sway the masses. It is less about the troubles of the nursing profession, than improving her likability and overall look to those who know her as being rather harsh.

She follows a nurse around for a couple of hours and then goes home with her to eat dinner with her family. It all just sounds a bit unbelievable, like she is trying too hard...because she is. She never has seemed like a kind, loving person who tries to relate and understand other people. So, the attempted switch from ball-breaking, eat-your-heart-with-a-spoon to a I-just-want-the-world-to-be-better personality is just not easy to accept so abruptly. But the Hillary camp does have another year to perfect this strategy. We'll see how it develops.

Hillary's Records Won't Be Public

2007-08-15T09:48:00.000-07:00

Hillary's files will be kept from the American public until well after the 2008 presidential election. Nearly 2 million pages of former First Lady Clinton's White House years will be locked up in the Clinton Presidential Library slowly processed by archivists. But already at least 1,000 pages have been censored and will be kept secret under the Presidential Records Act. The Clinton Library's chief archivist has said that it could take years to release these records.

For someone like this who has probably never had, or desired a private life (except for the mistakes she failed to prevent) it almost seems as though things are being deliberately kept from the voters. But this is just convenient for the Clinton campaign, not a deliberate and deceitful act to prevent America from discovering Hillary's "inconvenient truth," right?

This is only one of the reasons I don't think that a former first-spouse should be able to run for President. It is a definite sign of an obsession with power. There are just too many issues that can and probably will cause conflict if said spouse is elected.

Hillary has tried to force her choice-issues down our throats ever since the beginning of her political life. Don't we have the right to know everything we can about the potential person in charge of our country?

Hillary Clinton's TV Ad

2007-08-14T20:13:00.000-07:00

WE WON'T BE INVISIBLE TO HILLARY---HOORAY!!!!

Are people really invisible to this administration? No.

Is she really going to make all of us visible? Of course, she is a loving, caring, nurturing woman who will bake warm chocolate chip cookies for every single American citizen and illegal alien when she is in charge. Really? Unless she is the all-seeing eye of Sauron (aren't you familiar with The Lord of the Rings?), she can't possibly see us all; but even if she was, she wouldn't care. Obviously this concept is for trashing Bush, and since his approval rating is increasing again, trying to squash his achievements with lies.

This is Hillary-manipulation at its finest, and priciest. Telling America that the President doesn't care about our military and veterans? Single mothers are invisible? Uninsured citizens are not worth the attention? Who can listen to these accusations, and even consider Hillary Clinton as their President? Low blows, bitterness, plastic surgery, extra make-up, a popularly deceitful husband, and LIES....that is what is fueling this campaign.

Our military has had more deserved pay raises under Bush than it has seen since Reagan. But what does Hillary want to do? Tell them to drop their weapons and run home, she will be waiting to pat their back and give them some hot cocoa when they return. As for Americans without health-care, I was one of them for a couple of months. Even being a pregnant woman with Type 1 diabetes, I was taken care of just fine. Which reminds me, why don't people seek assistance from their family, church or community before begging on the White House lawn? I suppose that is another blog for another day.

Strength and Experience?

2007-08-10T22:09:00.000-07:00

Sen. Clinton's controversial Chief Strategist Mark Penn released a campaign memo last week entitled "Strength and Experience." In his memo, Penn cites numerous polls showing Hillary's image and favorability rising above other presidential candidates. Not only have I seen polls that show the opposite, I don't think that anything a sleazy, indecisive opportunist like Penn can be taken seriously.

First, Hillary's strength. Where has she shown this great strength? In her stance on Iraq? In her parenting? Or perhaps in hiring people to threaten and manipulate the subjects of her husband's philandering? No, nor does it take much strength to follow the flow and pander to any audience placed before you.

Second, Hillary's experience. Experience with what exactly? Trying again to push an already failed healthcare plan? Her time sleeping in the cozy bed of the White House, behind her popular yet tainted husband? Maybe it is her experience in law, when she put herself in positions that could only be used to advance her position politically?

This is the great strength and experience Mark Penn is referring to? Thanks Mr. Penn, but no thanks. You can go back to spying on your former employees now.

Hillary at the Gay Debate

2007-08-09T21:10:00.001-07:00

When asked about her past response to Gen. Pace calling homosexuality immoral, Hillary says that it was a mistake. She got carried away on the wrong point, but I'm not sure she really answered the question. She basically says, "Sorry, we were trying to accomplish more for gays, it just wasn't enough to see."

I'm still wondering why when homosexuality has become increasingly more open, it is the president's job to make people accept it. If people are uncomfortable with a lifestyle, they can't just change how feel, and if they are forced to by the government how will we be any better than any other oppressive nation? God forbid Hillary be elected President, but if she should and she pushes gaylove down our throats it will just be another case of her robbing Americans of their much needed, individualizing personal opinions. Talk about catering to special interests.

Gay. Straight. Blond. Brunette. Let us make our own choices to love or hate whatever we want. Certainly don't waste our tax dollars to impose an agenda that can and will only divide us further.

Hillary's Rebuild America Plan

2007-08-08T21:11:00.000-07:00

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton takes another cheap shot at gaining support by playing on people's fears after the Minnesota bridge collapse. Clinton blames the tragedies of Hurricane Katrina and the Minnesota bridge collapse on our "underinvestment" in America. Meaning, we clearly don't pay enough taxes.

Hillary has jumped on this tragic opportunity to make people think that she is the only candidate that cares. In her "Rebuild America Plan" she pledges billions of dollars to improve public transit, intercity passenger rail, seaports, congestion and traffic growth, and broadband. Most of these issues are that of state and local governments, which she is planning to squeeze out by increasing "federal investment in public transit." This is yet another example of Hillary trying to pull our country from its founding principles of limited central government and state's responsibility.

This plan stresses an underinvestment in public transit, which she will solve by increasing federal investment by $1.5 billion per year. When I was going to school in Seattle, I had to pay for a bus pass, actually my parents had to pay for my bus pass. Why should we have to give more tax dollars to pay for people, who are already paying their own fee, to ride the bus or train when we may never ride it ourselves?

Hillary's Rebuild America Plan is also geared toward decreasing mythical global warming. Currently about 5% of Americans commute by public transit, but she figures doubling this amount will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 25%. But the only way Hillary could sweeten the public transit pot for people like me is to increase gas taxes even more, which she is working on. Even then, I would still drive. I will not be riding public transit with a fussing ten month old and a very energetic three year old. Its just not going to happen.

The disasters that happen on public thoroughfares are truly saddening, but if they are state and local governments' responsibility, then they need to find the solution -- not the federal government. And no, the bridge in Minnesota did not collapse because of Bush's war in Iraq.

There will always be people like me who cannot or will not use public transportation, so why should we have to pay even more for something we may never use?

Hillary's Military Support

2007-08-07T15:52:00.000-07:00

Former President Bill Clinton gave a speech in the Panhandle of Florida last night, where he spoke about his wife's strength with military voters and her ability to rebuild a depleted military. Though he was speaking in an area heavily populated with active military and veterans, about 85 people actually attended the event. Click here for other articles.

Clinton credits his wife's supposed gaining of support among the military to her cold and unwanting seat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. I personally don't know anyone in the military who would vote for Hillary Clinton, even if they didn't like the other choices, they would not vote for her. That's not to say that there aren't people in the military who won't vote for her, there are a few bad apples on every tree. But many of these will be the type of people who flee to Canada to avoid deployment, those who joined because they thought it would be easy and that there wouldn't be any chance of a war. The same people without honor, discipline, courage and integrity.

Slick Willy also said that military voters should be concerned about how the next president goes about rebuilding a depleted military, and that Hillary was the best man for that job. The military is not depleting, most enlistment goals are being met or exceeded. That is not to mention the great number of people re-enlisting. Click here for details.

One great quality about most of the people I have met in the military is their sense of duty, and personal responsibility. They take care of themselves and what is theirs. Why would people with these values vote for someone who supports irresponsibility and is actually planning on funding it throughout our country? Then there is the woman factor (if that is what we are calling her), but that is another post, another day.

To Nuke or Not to Nuke...

2007-08-04T21:31:00.000-07:00

As the Hillary/Obama spat spirals into a seemingly adolescent rivalry, the subject of using nuclear weapons has entered the arena. Barrack Obama says that he absolutely would not use them against Al Qaida, and Hillary Clinton says that a president could never take the nuclear option off the table. In the attempt to make herself seem more man-like and able, she of course says that she would be willing to nuke terrorists. I can't think of why anyone wouldn't be willing to use such force against our world's greatest threat, so Hillary's statement doesn't seem that bold to me. But she says it trying to embolden herself and wussify Obama.

In the attempt to make herself seem stronger and wiser, and more "manlike" she takes on an irritating, redundant air. Nobody ever thought of her as feminine from the beginning. Not that she has "manlike" strength, just lacking any softer female characteristics. Will this asexual candidate actually be able to push the big red button? Probably not. Neither would Obama, but in either case the War on Terror will spiral completely out of control. A female president, a weak president. Nukes, no nukes. Whatever you choose there won't be a simple way out. This war will get worse before it gets better.

Will Chelsea Campaign for Mommy Dearest?

2007-08-03T18:17:00.000-07:00

Former President Clinton said that his daughter has her own life to live, hinting that she won't be very active in her mother's presidential campaign. It will speak volumes if she does not come out more for Hillary. I couldn't blame her if she doesn't help out, after all it isn't like her mother ever changed her diapers, or taught her how to make spaghetti, or gave her nurturing hugs when her middle-school boyfriend broke up with her--you know, the things a caring mother does.

Let's face it. Chelsea was not the product of the great love of Bill and Hillary Clinton, she was more of a political move to make her parents seem like an All-American, loving family. If she doesn't take a more prominent role in Hillary's campaign, she may as well spit in their faces and start protesting abortion with pro-lifers, that would make them equally as proud.

Youth Opportunity Agenda: Robbing Americans of Responsibility

2007-08-01T16:01:00.000-07:00

Last week Hillary's campaign released her "Youth Opportunity Agenda" which claims to address the "silent crisis of disconnected youth." This plan focuses mainly on minorities, or as she likes to call them "at risk" youth. She begins by saying that we need to close the Early Achievement Gap. To do this, she will invest $10 billion of taxpayers money into Universal Preschool, which is where she thinks the problems with education and getting a decent job begin. She next wants to give $100 million to expand mentoring and support programs during the summer for at risk middle- and high-school students. Which is just another way of relieving parents of their parental responsibilities.

She will also extinguish racial and sex discrimination in the labor market by restoring the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division to its "historic role that vigorously enforces people's civil rights." The term "vigorously enforce" is a bit frightening, leaving employers with no right to hire who they want to hire. Without any say so in their investment, why would anyone actually want to own or run a business?

Another factor in the plan to suppress this "silent crisis" is to reward responsible fatherhood, or give financial incentives to fathers who actually pay their child support. But there is no mention of rewarding fathers who actually raise their children, who emotionally and financially support their family day in and day out. Sen. Clinton's final phase of this Youth Opportunity Agenda is to "close the prison revolving door." In this she will give $200 million to programs aimed at reintegrating the offenders into the economy and society.

As the new Clinton government expands, there will be absolutely no personal responsibility and no consequences, and minorities will be given highest priority. As these youths targeted by Hillary's plan grow older they will be even less accountable adults having never had to work or put forth any real effort to achieve anything. This Agenda will destroy whatever is left of respect, responsibility, pride and ethics in this country.

For more details on Clinton's "Youth Opportunity Agenda" click here.

Hillary's Public Service Academy

2007-07-30T12:42:00.000-07:00

Sen. Hillary Clinton has said that if elected president, she wants to create a public service academy designed to inspire young Americans to serve others. This seems to contradict her liberal views, where most people count on the government to do everything for them, unless of course she wants this younger generation to all work for the government. Then, of course, this idea will hinder her hopes to make the government run more efficiently. But that's okay, she never would have made that work, even if she had meant it.

She describes this plan of hers as "a new citizenship" that defines who we are as a nation. Hillary once again trashed Bush's response to Katrina, global warming and destroying our world standing. But she said to a group of young Democrats who have not yet learned to think on their own, "We can restore America's image around the world. Let's do it together." So, what she is saying is that she wants the world to view Americans as people who are unable to take care of themselves, but generous incompetents. That sounds really effective. After years of caring about only one thing...her political position...her thought process is truly hindered.

The Death of Vince Foster

2007-07-29T15:00:00.001-07:00

I find it shockingly hypocritical that the same people who have been concocting 9/11 conspiracy theories, have been attacking Sean Hannity so violently for his "Clinton Chapters."

There is sketchy evidence in the death of Vince Foster. Suicide notes being found after the police search, "personal files" being found in the White House. If any of Hillary's defenders can explain this to me, please come forward.

Clinton and Obama's Personal Debate

2007-07-27T20:21:00.000-07:00

What started at Monday's debate has only continued throughout the week into a juvenile name-calling match. Clinton said that Obama's idea of meeting one-on-one with hostile regime leaders in the first year of his presidency would be irresponsible and naive, and that it could lead to these nations using the American president for propaganda purposes. Later in the week Obama said that Hillary's authorization for the war in Iraq was irresponsible and naive. And there have been unoriginal blows from each candidate ever since.

"Each of them is trying to use it now to reinforce the overall message," said Mark Mellman, a Democratic consultant sitting out this election so far. "Clinton is saying this proves her greater experience and preparation for leadership, and that Obama is inexperienced. Obama is trying to say that her experience is what got us into the war. So they're both trying to use it to make a larger point about their overall messages." See Chicago Tribune article for more.

So, I guess until they kiss and make-up, they won't be able to run on the Clinton-Obama '08 ticket together. Darn.

Did She Really Claim That African Americans Were the "Heart and Soul" of Her Campaing?

2007-07-25T17:14:00.000-07:00

Sen. Clinton has made it a point to involve different races in the management of her campaign, this motive seems fairly obvious to me, not so much mindless drones in the far-left field. In the attempt to gain votes she wants to seem like she cares about all types of people. She said however, "I want to have as inclusive and diverse a campaign as I can because that's the way I want to govern. We just want to do things right." Perhaps, if she just wants "to do things right" she should surround herself with the most qualified people, and describe them as such. It seems extremely inappropriate to me that she feels the need to tell America that she is tolerant enough to hire a racially diverse staff. If she was racist, she probably wouldn't have gotten where she is, but I suppose Sen. Robert Byrd has proved that theory wrong.

With how hard she is trying to win over the races, I fear that we could end up paying reparations. Former White House political advisor, Minyon Moore said, "Senator Clinton has always championed issues that impact people of color in general and African Americans in particular." This quote describes her tendencies. I want my president to care about all United States citizens, regardless of their race or social status. This description of Hillary Clinton tells me nothing more than "I just want your vote....and yours....and yours.....and yours." The sooner people realize she doesn't care about them, the better. She will crush our country with her socialist agenda, and step on the backs of minorities, lower income families, military families (I could go on and on) to get there.

Tonight's CNN/YouTube Debate: How Would the Muslim World Handle a Female President

2007-07-23T23:33:00.000-07:00

It is not a matter of whether or not she will be taken seriously, by Arab and Muslim countries. Many of them have begun to adapt to the 21st century. It is our current Middle-East issues (Iraq, Iran, etc.) where she won't be respected or effective. Her reading off a global list of female leaders cannot make her anymore qualified to deal with backward, vicious dictators. Being an Islamic extremist is far different that being your typical male chauvinist. Here she may be told to "fetch me a beer, and bake me some cookies, woman." There it is more likely that she would be be-headed or our country attacked, being viewed as weak for electing a female.

Her self-righteous, better-than-thou attitude will not go far in the Middle East.

Do Polls Show Skeptism For Hillary?

2007-07-20T23:11:00.000-07:00

In this New York Times/CBS News Poll Hillary isn't quite the woman's woman she thinks she is. The frightening thing is, more women vote than men, and women's votes tend to be more emotional than logical....sorry ladies. More importantly than the gender divide is that about 40% of the voters have an unfavorable view of Hillary Clinton. She leaves a bad taste in the mouths of men and women alike.

Even hard core Bill Clinton supporters didn't like Hillary when she was the first lady. We all joked that she was really in charge. Nobody liked her then, and I can't believe that they do now. If she is elected it will be for the wrong reasons.

So, if you give weight to political polls, here it is.

Hillary's Planned Parenthood Pitch...

2007-07-18T23:14:00.000-07:00

Hillary Clinton spoke to a group of Planned Parenthood supporters on Tuesday. It doesn't seem that this is a crowd that needs Hillary's courting, but since Barack Obama also spoke to the group, she had to make her appearance. These sort of stops seem very routine at this point, her arrogance seems to make her believe that she has already won, and that we should just all sit back and take it.

In this talk, she glossed over her plans to improve women's health care, sparing the crowd her plans for complete universal health care. She also attacked Republicans saying that they "are not just opposing abortion, they're opposing contraceptives and women's rights." This just sounds like another hateful speech trying to sway people by pulling their emotional rip-cords. Do the Republicans really oppose women's rights? I don't think so. Perhaps it is the idea of federally funded abortions that Republicans oppose. After all, why should I have to pay for someone less responsible than myself to get an abortion which I view to be immoral?

After Clinton and Obama both slammed the Supreme Court for their ruling on late term abortion, Hillary again pushed her "all-knowing" attitude on the crowd. She said, "I would appoint well-qualified judges who really respect the Constitution." We really should all believe this too since Hillary herself has shown such a high regard for our Constitution.

So have no fear, Hillary is here.

Free Trade

2007-07-17T21:51:00.000-07:00

Though this is a major political issue, and definitely one that our presidential candidates should address, I haven't heard much from Sen. Clinton on free trade, or any trade for that matter--other than her husband's detailed encounters of trading women.

Being as Hillary is using her "First Lady" experience as authoritative experience for the White House, perhaps she should explain her views on NAFTA and China. Douglas Turner, in his article for The Buffalo News, describes how these two trade initiatives cost New York state alone nearly 200,000 jobs, though it was swore they would help our economy and employment rate during the Clinton administration.

Phillepe Reines, Hillary Clinton's spokesman, says that she favors "smart trade" where environmental and labor ideals are prevalent. Sure, we should focus more on who burns their waste in a barrel than who sends us tainted products. Perhaps instead of condemning a free trade agreement with South Korea, she should be more active in tightening up on our trade policies with China.

Since we have received several defective and/or poisonous goods over the last year from China, she could take an active role in monitoring this relationship. Perhaps being somewhat of a communist herself, she is less likely to regulate the dealings of a like-minded nation than she is to support the common values our country was founded on.

Having known people who have gone to Iraq, I deeply care about this issue. But, we all know how the differing sides view Iraq, but Iraq will settle down one day. So Hillary, tell us about how you would handle an ongoing problem, not so much in the forefront, such as free trade.

Hillary's brother's trial gets pushed back...

2007-07-15T20:43:00.000-07:00

The trial of Tony Rodham, Hillary Clinton's brother (yes, you do remember the name "Rodham"), which was supposed to be held last week, has been continued until next month. This lawsuit accuses Rodham of failing to repay a loan from the late Edgar Gregory of United Shows of America.

Mr. and Mrs. Gregory were pardoned of a bank fraud conviction by President Bill Clinton in March of 2000. But now, a bankruptcy court asks Hillary's brother to pay $107,000 plus interest for a loan, which Vonna Rodham says were really for consulting services, not a loan.

Let's just get this straight...whatever the services were, evidently the Gregorys require more. Hillary's brother must be a real sleaze-bag if a presidential pardon was not a good enough payment, and the widow is actually requiring more.

Rodham's lawyer said that this would be settled, before ever making it to court. And why wouldn't it be? If Hillary has low enough morals to push for a pardon, why wouldn't she just pay them whatever they want?

Hillary's Vision of Shared Prosperity

2007-07-13T22:57:00.000-07:00

Sen. Clinton announced her support today for closing a tax loophole allowing Wall Street investment managers to pay a 15% tax rate on their compensation in the form of carried interest, as opposed to an income tax rate which could go up to 35%. In her media release Hillary is described as having an economic vision that focuses on "shared prosperity" and promoting "tax fairness that rewards work, not just wealth." Has any tax rate ever rewarded wealth? You make more, you pay more.

Is there anyone who would not use this loophole saving them up to 20% if they could? I support fairness, but a 35% tax rate on anything is insanely high. Her vision of "shared prosperity" is eerily Utopian and concerns me greatly with what type of society we could reform to under her leadership. She could suggest a lower flat tax rate for everyone, but I am sure that does not fit in to her quest for "tax fairness."

The all-knowing Sen. Clinton said, "Private equity and venture capital play important roles in our economy, and we should continue to support the entrepreneurial spirit that makes America great." But what she was really thinking here is "...and we should destroy it by crushing people's desire to earn more." So what she was thinking is we should crush the American Dream.

She described how she would use the funds generated from closing this loophole by saying, "I would use the funds generated by the change-which some have estimated at $4-$6 billion per year-to invest in our middle class and working families. These funds can provide a down payment to help make college more affordable, provide tax relief for hard working Americans, and meet other key priorities to promote shared prosperity in America."

So, she would take away one of the main reasons many people actually do strive to make more money. I don't want those who make more than me to pay for my life and my children's education, nor do I want to pay for other people's when I am making more money. It sounds to me like she would like to further separate the classes in America as opposed to uniting them, as she has claimed.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2396

Hillcam: Ready for Change, Ready to Lead

2007-07-12T23:25:00.001-07:00

Hillary Calls on her YouTube Fans...

2007-07-10T14:52:00.000-07:00

In a press release on Hillary Clinton's website today, she asked for her supporters to send in videos for the CNN/YouTube debate on July 23.

From Clinton's campaign website:

CNN/YouTube has asked all the candidates to create a thirty-second video to be aired during the debate. Clinton is asking her supporters to take on the assignment and submit their own videos, explaining to America why Hillary is their choice for President. http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2353

Hillary is once again trying to exude a more relate-able persona, and interact with her supporters. She is trying to make people believe she cares, even about those of us whose lives are pretty much confined to the Internet. I just hope those poor YouTubers who send her adoring videos don't actually think that she will care about them after the election. After she gets their votes, they will be of no use to her and will be discarded, much like she will do with American babies.

Perhaps she is afraid of her campaign making an "all-about-Hillary" video, because whatever issues she discusses in said video, will be questioned. Her instability on issues will be brought to the forefront once again and that is not something she is ready to back up. She could just say, "I am human" and at least most Democrats would forgive her. But she's not human, she is some sort of socialistic gremlin whose sincerity stops at her loathing for everything conservative.

Scoundrels, Part 2

2007-07-08T17:44:00.000-07:00

Hillary Clinton is taking some heat for her presidential campaign's chief strategist, Mark Penn. Penn is the CEO of Burson-Marsteller, a public relations company whose clients include tobacco and pharmaceutical firms, along with many other "evil" institutions. She chooses a chief strategist who has helped companies who she is politically against, at the very least against her views on health care and our delicate environment. This seems to prove further hypocrisies in the beast that is Hillary. Mr. Penn does not think that there is any conflict of interests, of course to him this is all very normal since he has been a manipulative tool of the Clintons since 1996. Penn said, "I don't think that there's any obligation that the firm's clients agree on every issue that's out there either with themselves or Sen. Clinton." No, there certainly isn't an obligation, but I think we all expect a little more from this extremely self-righteous presidential candidate.

Another example of the complex hypocrisy in this Clinton/Penn relationship is in Hillary's stance on eavesdropping for public safety. She said that this system is "far-fetched" and damned it by saying that it is "a secret program that spies on Americans!" But recently Mark Penn was accused of illegally monitoring a former employee's e-mail. We will see how that plays out in court, but for now, these are more examples of Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy. After eight years as the first lady, I never thought she would have made it this far. But clearly, many Americans can turn their cheek as easily as Hillary herself.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/08/wclinton108.xml

Scoundrels

2007-07-07T22:09:00.000-07:00

What I find the most puzzling about this is that a high-profile Democrat like Hillary Clinton finds it particularly easy to suck money out of wealthy liberal activists like the attendees of this event, yet she still feels compelled to break the law so that her campaign can pocket a few $100 thousand.

Even if Hillary knew nothing of this false reporting, which she more than likely did, it shows the country the type of people who she chooses to surround herself with. We should not reward this sort of behavior by electing them to positions of the greatest power, while punishing ourselves at the same time. Or perhaps we should, my dad always said, "If people are dumb enough to elect them (in this case her), then they deserve what they get." Unfortunately, if this were the case, those of us who value truth, honesty and responsibility will also pay this terrible price.

Liars, swindlers and scoundrels naturally flock to the Clintons. Are these the type of people we want running our country?

Live Earth

2007-07-06T21:28:00.000-07:00

In a press release earlier today, Senator Hillary Clinton applauded the Live Earth concerts around the world. She said, "As people gather around the globe for Live Earth, they draw attention to the clear choice that we face. It is past time for us to act. If we do it right, we can transform this grave environmental challenge into an opportunity to establish the United States as a clean energy leader."

For those who believe that global warming is a real problem, and not just another one of Earth's many cycles, please present us with further proof beyond melting icebergs and increased tropical storms. If global warming is going to bring an end to life as we know it, then I don't think that there is much we will be able to do about it. When God makes up his mind to clear the slate that is Earth, then we should pray instead of attending concerts that cause more o-zone deterioration than an entire family will in a decade.

In a further attempt to sell her green lifestyle, Hillary says, "I have also made my campaign carbon neutral by offsetting all carbon emissions produced by the campaign during travel, at the headquarters and in all state offices." If Hillary was truly concerned about her carbon footprint I am sure that she would have used more eco-friendly vehicles and not sent empty private jets flying back and forth simply because they were not comfy enough for her return flight. Perhaps this is just me, but I find it difficult to fall into a fad promoted by hypocrites.

Reagan on Independence Day, How Would Hillary Compare?

2007-07-04T20:07:00.000-07:00

She wouldn't. Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century, the only comparison would be Teddy Roosevelt.

In this talk, Reagan refers to sacrifices, what do you think Hillary Clinton is willing to sacrifice for our country? Other than her marriage, nothing. But to her, I don't think marriage means much.

Today, we need to think about how fotunate we are, and how much better off we are than other counties. We need to think about what we have, and what we might lose if someone like Hillary Clinton is elected President. Every time I think that no one cares about this country anymore, all I have to do is listen to something from Ronald Reagan, and I think that there must be more people like him....we will be okay.

Young America's Foundation In The News

A Few Things We Should Keep in Mind While Celebrating Our Independence...

2007-07-04T13:45:00.000-07:00

As we set off fireworks and celebrate this very important holiday with family and friends, let's try and remember what United States citizens celebrated on the very first anniversary of our beloved country. Let's reflect on the things that our founders appreciated, but Hillary Clinton probably never will.

This country was founded as a republic, a limited government for the people. The idea of a limited government was to protect the people and keep the government out of our lives. Citizens were to be held responsible for their actions, we relied on personal responsibility instead of relying on the government for our personal needs. At this time, no one is held accountable for their actions, someone else is always at fault. And it is the governments job to fix it. This is the mindset that Hillary embraces. In her mind, we should bulk up the government to coddle our citizens, and even those who aren't citizens. Clinton is spitting in the face of our heroic founders with her disrespect for their core beliefs.

Those who have fought for our freedom and in our defense--defense of our country and our beliefs--fight for what we are, what we have been, and what we hope to always be. I am afraid to see where a socialist will steer our country. Today, ignore the flaws and appreciate freedom, accomplishment, responsibility, and pride.

HillaryCare

2007-07-03T21:32:00.001-07:00

This is what President Hillary Clinton will try to revive, if elected to office.

Senator Clinton Condemns the Libby Commutation

2007-07-03T14:35:00.000-07:00

Hillary's statement on the Libby Commutation:

"Today's decision is yet another example that this Administration simply considers itself above the law. This case arose from the Administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies. Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice." --Sen. Hillary Clinton

Well before we start dissecting the hypocrisies of Hillary's statement, let me first state that Libby was probably judged a bit too harshly for the crimes he committed, which are debatable in my mind. Libby was targeted because of his relationship to the White House. That's it and that's all.

Even if I were a Hillary-fan I would not be able to take this condemnation of Bush's commutation, or any other pardon he may execute while in office, to heart. I have to first take into account the number of commutations and pardons her husband gave while they "shared" the White House. There were 38 commutations and 147 pardons. Then I have to think about some of the crimes these people were pardoned and commuted for. These offenses include (but are certainly not limited to) cocaine trafficking, tax evasion, perjury (but we know that the Clintons were okay with perjury), bank fraud and sexual assault...to name a few.

I hope that anyone who takes Hillary's words to heart will keep this in mind.

Hillary WILL Raise Taxes, don't worry its a Patriotic Tax Hike!

2007-07-01T23:26:00.000-07:00

In the last Democratic Presidential debate Senator Hillary Clinton spoke once again about raising taxes for the wealthy in America. She said, "We have to change the tax system and we've got to get back to having those with the most contribute to this country." It sounds to me like she is saying that wealthy Americans do not contribute to society. Perhaps she doesn't think that the jobs they create, their philanthropic endeavors, and the taxes they pay are just quite enough. Maybe since they have been fortunate enough to be considered "wealthy" she would like to just strip them of their fortune to fatten up government bureaucracy...oh wait, that is what she is trying to do.

Hillary has surrounded herself with people like Warren Buffett, who referred to Republicans as the type who think, "I'm making $80 million a year, God must have intended me to have a lower tax rate." You must be right Mr. Buffett, that is how Republicans think. Hillary described Buffett as, "He's honest enough to say, look, tax me because I'm a patriotic American." This sounds like she is describing someone who is not all there in the head.

What these hate-the-world/save-the-world people have yet to realize is that successful businessmen do pay taxes, they pay more than I do. Middle-class Americans, like myself, will be encouraged to despise wealthy Americans if Hillary's influence succeeds. Though the wealthy pay more taxes than the rest of us, she wants us to think that they don't. It doesn't sound to me like she really wants to unite Americans, so much as pin them against each other.

I personally believe that we all pay too many taxes. I think that people would be more inclined to give money to causes if they weren't forced to do so. The more that is taken away from us, the less we will give, and this is doubly so for the wealthy Americans who are more philanthropic than I am.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/AmandaCarpenter/2007/06/29/hillary_clinton’s_‘patriotic’_tax_hike

Hillary slams Supreme Court ruling

2007-06-29T23:06:00.000-07:00

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that students cannot be assigned to public schools because of their race. This decision and "the Roberts court" were attacked by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as she said the "once again...the court has shown its willingness to erode core constitutional guarantees. It is a set back for all of us who are on the long march toward racial equality."

Of course, with the upcoming election, it doesn't make much of a difference what the decision was actually about. As long as it can be construed as controversial, it will be twisted by the candidates so they can play heroes for us little people who need saving, and coincidentally are too stupid to read, and do research, and form our own opinions. Thank you for looking out for us.

Hillary also said in her statement that she will "create an education system where all children have an equal chance to learn and excel together." She is trying to make this sound like re-segregation, which it clearly is not. She probably feels like, with enough manipulation, she could be seen as the next great champion for civil rights. Fat chance.

It is racist to pluck a black child from an outlying neighborhood and push him into a predominantly white or Latino school, just because that school needs more black students. Just like it is racist to give racial preferences for university admissions, and having quotas to meet the forced diversity.

This decision will not reduce racial inequality in schools, Hillary. Maybe we should look a little closer at school choice, for everyone, not just those you choose.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2207

How will Hillary stand against Iran?

2007-06-27T23:07:00.000-07:00

Evidently, about as firmly as she does on everything else. Pathetic.

She has said time and again that "no option can be taken off the table," but if a Republican mentions a possible nuclear strike, she is quick to jump and say that we need to exhaust diplomacy. So a military strike, or a potential nuclear strike are not included in her absolute phrase "no option can be taken off the table." Well, anything but that...

Obviously, no one wants a nuclear war. But we are trying to reason with a crazy, hateful country when dealing with Iran. At one point she said, in reference to restoring our international leadership, one of the biggest steps was "understanding that American strength is more than just the show of force." I just don't think that it is in our country's best interests to not acknowledge that anything short of force will save the world from a nuclear Iran.

I know that we are spread thin militarily, and I know that a diplomatic solution would be ideal. Senator Clinton thinks that we should keep on talking, but unfortunately, Iran is not listening. If she were to become President, there would be even less negotiating. While the hypothetical president is deciding whether or not we should use force, or just how much longer we should "talk," or just simply waiting for her to make up her mind on how she feels about Iran, we will probably have already lost much more than our "Works-and-Plays-Well-With-Others" badge in the world playground.

Perhaps we should just let this girl sit on the sidelines, while stronger leaders handle and resolve the disasters we face.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/speech/view/?id=1328
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2741915920070627

Slick Willy Strikes Again...

2007-06-26T23:15:00.000-07:00

Former President Clinton recently sent out a mass e-mail to jump start the "One Week, One Million" fundraising campaign for Hillary's scratch at the presidency. In this e-mail Bill tries to get people excited by describing her strengths and how anxious he is to get out on the campaign trail with her; and of course, claiming she will need the money to fend off vicious and unfounded attacks from Republicans, just like during his presidency. He tries to connect with the recipients saying, "You and I know something about waging and winning presidential campaigns."

Of course this whole message sounds like a crock to me. Bill ends his little letter by saying, "Hillary and I couldn't do it without you." It is obvious that Hillary knows she is not well liked, mostly due to her cold, coarse demeanor (not to mention her often contradictory, socialist views) so she tries to use her "old buddy" Bill to try and connect with their base by making them think he will be sharing the future presidency with her. We all know he would love nothing more than to steal the show, which she may let him do from time to time in hopes of pulling in more voters. But in the end, if she wins, she will thank him for his services in the style of a praying-mantis.

Anyone who can believe Slick Willy's message, especially about Washington Republicans' baseless, insulting attacks while he was president, clearly do not remember his insulting actions in the oval office. Keep on campaigning Bill, those of us smart enough know you and your spouse for what you are--deceitful, opportunistic and unpatriotic--and we will remember that on election day.

---To see Bill Clinton's e-mail, click on COMMENTS below.---

Clinton and Boxer plot against First Amendment

2007-06-24T13:16:00.001-07:00

This is Senator Jim Inhofe describing a conversation he overheard between Hillary Clinton and Barbara Boxer.

Whether this was a serious plot or just an angry conversation between two witches venting, it gives people insight into how Hillary Clinton really thinks. She can pass off this alleged conversation as an emotional overflow, or deny it completely. But the truth remains the same, she abhors the voice of the right and given the chance she will silence it. If she comes into office, what will stop her. Nothing, with the exception of those of us who are willing to fight.

But why should we wait and see what she "could" do? If she gets into the executive position, it will probably be too late.

"She has to prove she's a woman."

2007-06-23T22:44:00.000-07:00

Oh, finally someone agrees with me. Peggy Noonan described Hillary as almost dark and inhuman, in her Wall Street Journal article, "What's Not to Like." She touched on the initial perceptions of Hillary Clinton from the early years, when our country knew that she was "grimly combative and rather dark." Noonan quoted a longtime supporter of the former First Lady's saying, "We're back where we were in '92--likability. Nothing has changed." This much is true, nothing has changed. But most don't realize that.

Though Hillary's jagged, dark interior hasn't changed, her facade has softened and relaxed quite a bit. This is all through make-up and great coaching, of course. She has an incredible team working around the clock to make sure she seems like a human being, trying to change our perception and erase our memories of the real Hillary Clinton. The same Hillary Clinton who left the White House with more valuables than she took in. She has spent the last 15 years, at least, trying to evolve her image, assuming voters will only remember the most recent version, like an auto-saved document.

We must remember who she really is. Peggy Noonan is right in the sense that Hillary needs to "prove she has normal human warmth...a normal amount of good nature." But I think that Noonan gives many people too much credit. There are so many people out there who will be so easily absorbed into the recent-document version of Hillary that they will forget the follies of past, which ultimately lead us to the monster within.

Let's not forget how she can change with the time and tide. She has and will again. The only thing constant about this candidate is her selfish ambition.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110010239

Hillary puts the Bill foot forward

2007-06-22T14:43:00.000-07:00

The Clinton camp has been using Bill sparingly, but plans on steadily increasing his appearances, or should I said performances, for wife Hillary. Former President Clinton will be joining his "life-partner" on high-profile visits to Iowa and New Hampshire in coming months to help boost her ratings. Recent polls "show the New York senator in a tough fight with Obama and John Edwards."

Evidently the Obama camp plans on making Hillary's husband an issue by criticizing his friendship with Ron Burkle as well as his "$300,000 speaking fees from Cisco, a company that has moved U.S. jobs to India." This is very generous of the Obama camp as they could very easily attack the Clintons' character instead, and probably move more voters than this soft-ball ball will. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070621-0736-thebillfactor.html

From a conservative point of view, which is obviously not what Hillary is interested in, Bill is a terrible pawn. Our country still has a sour taste from his term, and with any luck will retain that sour taste until the end of time. I guess Hillary's cronies are just hoping that the progressives and centrists they are targeting with Slick Willy's moves have forgotten his follies as president, and as an ungrateful citizen of this great country.

The "Blind" Trust

2007-06-21T14:08:00.000-07:00

Anyone who believes that the cold, calculating being that is Hillary Clinton would actually have something in her life that she was not in control of, much less know about, must not be thinking this through. I understand the purpose of blind trusts, and I also understand Hillary Clinton.

Since there is nothing in her life, or Bill's, that goes unnoticed, with the exception of this blog, it is incredibly hard to believe that she had no idea how much she had invested in Walmart. Having been on the board at Walmart in her earlier years, as well as sending back their courtesy donation a little more recently, she was undeniably aware that she had more at stake with them than just blocked memories of her humble past.

Perhaps this just shows, if nothing else, that this cold-hearted version of Robin Hood who wants to steal from the rich in America to give to the poor everwhere (in the world, that is), is really not concerned with anything more than her own status and fortune.

Hillary Clinton Sopranos Parody

2007-06-19T20:38:00.001-07:00

Oh, how cute. So, Chelsea didn't make an appearance in this video because she is on the fence....Mom or Rudy. Tough pick.

Clinton on Embryonic Stem Cell Research

2007-06-16T14:18:00.000-07:00

Yesterday, Clinton spoke to a group of people at Dartmouth College about her push for federally funded embryonic stem cell research. With her, she toted a 10-year-old Type 1 diabetic, and a 23-year-old quadriplegic who would both benefit from advances in stem cell research. Clinton said, "Every day that passes, we have families...waiting and wondering whether their government is really on the side of helping and saving the lives of their loved ones." She also claimed that the Bush Administration has a general contempt for science and disregard of evidence. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/06/15/republican_families_back_clinton_on_stem_cell_research/

I was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes 13 years ago, and I do not support embryonic stem cell research. Personally, this is very much a moral issue. But morals aside, I would also like there to be a few things left in this country that the government is not directly involved in. I want a cure for my disease, I want to live life to the fullest, and I want that for my children too. But I am not relying on the government to cure my disease. The more anyone relies on the government, the more they will be let down.

I support forms of stem cell research that do not destroy life, there is so much that can be accomplished without harming living beings. I think the key phrase here is "federally funded." The government has not stopped private funding for this research, so those who don't have a problem with the destruction of human embryos can still give their support (monetary or biological) to groups using this method without their funds being filtered through the government. Private industry has always been more efficient than the government.

If Hillary becomes our next president my hopes, and the hopes of so many others, for a limited government will be gone. This issue in particular will not be limited to existing embryos. That will only be the start. It will probably end up more like that terrible movie, The Island.

Are the flames of Hell too hot for Hillary?

2007-06-15T17:51:00.000-07:00

Hillary finally had the images of Mother Teresa removed from her campaign video in response to a letter from Mother Teresa's successor, Sister Nirmala. Clinton has shown no shame thus far, trying to tap every edge of the diversity pool.

Clinton's spokesman Phil Singer said that she "was proud to have worked with and known Mother Theresa" and that "Her order asked us to remove it from the video, so we did." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/15/101856.shtml?s=ic

I personally don't think it was the request to remove the image that finally made the Hillary camp take action... It was most certainly Hillary's burning that pushed them over, much like the burning of Satan's flesh when splashed with Holy water.

Hollywood Endorsement

2007-06-14T13:15:00.000-07:00

Steven Spielberg has recently endorsed Hillary Clinton for President...does this actually surprise anybody? Is it really going to influence anybody? Probably not. Those weak enough to turn to the dark side, just because Spielberg did, don't deserve the right to vote.

He does make those apocalyptic movies. Perhaps he would like to see the same devastating turn of events he has made on screen unfold in our country. I don't understand how these Hollywood billionaires think, nor do I want to. If I understood them, I would be like them. And I would not wish that on anyone.

Dick Morris: 2008 Election Predictions

2007-06-13T07:54:00.001-07:00

Well, this would be frightening!

It is just too bad we cannot require people to be informed before they vote. Many single women will vote for her because of her sex. They won't even bother worrying about their children becoming little liberal drones in Hillary's universal schools, because it will be free of charge.

Cramping Creativity

2007-06-11T12:24:00.000-07:00

Clinton says that the emphasis on testing in No Child Left Behind "puts American students in danger of losing their creative edge." She is worried that this may suppress our creative learners, arguing, "we have people who learned to get around obstacles, they didn't go in a straight line."

Well, tests can be really good obstacles. She cannot be advocating the touchy-feely pass/fail system, can she? Perhaps in her system, everyone will pass...with smiley face stickers.

A test is not going to destroy any students' creativity. It should challenge them, encourage them to pursue what they are good at and what they enjoy, while pushing them to try harder at the things they are not. This is what will create greater diversity, not coddling slackers and gagging so many with unnecessary electives.

Unfortunately, tests are required to assess quality. That is how we can determine how to improve ourselves. This is what will keep us "in the forefront of the World Economy." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/11/92618.shtml?s=ic

Florida Endorsements roll in....or not.

2007-06-09T19:26:00.000-07:00

"I have not endorsed Senator Clinton for President. Therefore the Hillary for President Campaign is not authorized to use my name, image, or this incorrect news report in any of your campaign literature or promotional material.'' -Rep. Kendrick Meek, http://www.miamiherald.com/416/story/133763.html

This was written in a letter sent to the Clinton campaign after they had announced that they would release another "major Florida endorsement" in a conference call Thursday afternoon. This call was cancelled, and in my opinion, the Clinton camp probably heaved a great sigh of dismay and gave each other worried looks about losing a semi-prominent African-American endorsement. Boo-hoo.

A Democrat from Florida who did endorse Clinton, Alcee Hastings said, "When we elect the next President Clinton, this country will be a much better place for the African-American community." Well, evidently not all seem to agree. Maybe there are still plenty of us who remember when Bill Clinton showed how great of an advocate for African-Americans he was when he wore that terrible afro-wig on Martha's Vineyard in 1997. http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1962

Hillary's Faith

2007-06-07T11:14:00.000-07:00

Now, I do not like to criticize some one's faith, but I will certainly question the validity of a person's faith when it is only used for their advantage. Hillary said in an interview that she would not have gotten through her husband's infidelity without her faith. When talking about her religious beliefs Clinton said, "I come from a tradition that is perhaps a little too suspicious of people who wear their faith on their sleeves." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=460058&in_page_id=1811

Hillary is a Methodist. I have never heard of Methodists scorning those who "wear their faith on their sleeves." Nor have I heard of that particular religion, or any legitimate religion for that matter, encouraging people with unfaithful spouses to support their philandering by hiring lawyers and private investigators to help keep their spouses escapades under wraps.

I don't disapprove of Hillary staying with her husband, but I certainly don't buy her "family values" excuse for keeping them together. Most Americans won't believe this either, we're smarter than that.

The Hillary Show Episode 2

2007-06-05T13:49:00.001-07:00

This shows Hillary for what she is. Husband-hating, money-hungry, self-interested, bitter.

I can't wait until they delve a little deeper in the dark pit that is Hillary. Perhaps if her socialist plans are revealed in cartoon form, liberals will finally be able to understand!

Bill's appointments aren't pulling though for Hillary

2007-06-02T18:36:00.000-07:00

Louis Freeh, the Bill Clinton appointed Director of the FBI, has claimed that he will endorse Rudy Giuliani for President in 2008. Evidently, this has come "as a blow to both Senator Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party." http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7007510290

They probably cannot believe Freeh has not remained true to former President Clinton and his pseudo-wife. Perhaps he thought that the Commander-in-Chief should be doing more than diddling an aide in the Oval Office.

In her own defense...

2007-06-01T06:46:00.000-07:00

Hillary defended her excessive use of oil-burning jets in Las Vegas. She said that she "did not believe her message was undermined by her acceptance of the private flights." She referred to the Senate rules on this matter by saying, "those were the rules. You'll have to ask somebody else whether that's good policy."

This defense sounds more like that of a child than a mature adult running for president. Isn't it her job to make "good" policy and just laws. Not that she has done an acceptable job of that in the past. I would challenge her to prove her love for the middle-class by living that lifestyle for one month. Surely, she would have to admit her hypocrisies then.

Did the Clinton Camp leak book in order to kill it?

2007-05-29T21:19:00.000-07:00

Probably.

In my opinion it is probably the most honest thing that wretched woman has ever done.

Ben Smith of The Politico describes it well enough for most. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0507/4198.html There is nothing that happens around Hillary Clinton that happens by surprise, she never stops manipulating the world around her. But, I don't think she can disguise the truth forever. American people are smarter than she gives them credit for, they will be informed when necessary.

Perhaps now the REAL Hillary will be exposed.

2007-05-26T23:21:00.001-07:00

She evidently thought that when her husband became president, he would be forced to be faithful-or at least appear as though he was.

Perhaps she thinks that if she becomes president, Bill will finally be a good husband. So, its not that she is a power-craving decepticon, she just wants the love of her husband. Yeah, right.

Pumping Pre-K

2007-05-23T22:01:00.000-07:00

On the trail, Hillary has been pumping her "Universal Pre-K" at any given opportunity, but is it really "school" or is it just day-care? This plan would will include "universal access to high quality pre-K for four year olds in five years through a federal-state partnership. Her proposal also provides flexibility to allow states to serve younger children once they have provided pre-K to all four year olds who need it."

First of all, she cannot guarantee a "high-quality pre-kindergarten program" until she can improve our K-12 system. I also find this a little alarming in the sense that this could take over a parent's job of raising their child. Yes, in the beginning this would be a voluntary service, but there is no volunteer under a control-freak, only appointment. Sure, this may be fine with some parents, but not me. I consider it my duty and privilege to teach my children. It is part of bearing and raising them. I don't trust anyone else to do it at this point in time.

This just sounds like another anti-family blow from the left.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1743

"American Obligation"

2007-05-20T21:56:00.000-07:00

While speaking at Dillard University yesterday, Clinton bashed the Bush administration for the slow rate of recovery in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. She said, "If talk, bureacracy and promises were enough, we would've rebuilt New Orleans three times over by now."

She is once again trying to sell her myth of government reform as well as promissing to streamline federal funds to repair the Gulf Coast. Since when have democrats ever made our government run more efficiently? Perhaps she is planning on going to New Orleans to rebuild it herself.

http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007705200395

Another noteworthy endorsement for Hillary Clinton

2007-05-18T06:47:00.000-07:00

Along with her slew of liberal endorsements, Hillary has another to add to the list. The famous porn star, Jenna Jameson says, "I love Hillary...I would love to have a woman in office." She also said that Bill's years in office were "the best years for the adult industry."

Of course things were better for the porn industry under the Clinton Administration, he probably would have preferred a job in that field! This endorsement certainly does not say great things about Hillary's base.

http://www.laist.com/2007/05/17/thanks_to_her_h.php

Oxy-Clinton

2007-05-17T07:05:00.001-07:00

This is hilarious! I can't help but think there might be many liberals that would still need this pill.

Message from President Clinton

2007-05-17T06:59:00.001-07:00

They really busted out the big guns early on this one. He actually tries to make his wife sound like a caring person while spouting her resume. But, I can't honestly think of one person who can take what Bill Clinton says to heart.

Think about it....if he really respected his wife, why can't he be faithful to her?

Mother's Day Address

2007-05-12T23:43:00.000-07:00

"Nothing keeps mothers up at night more than worrying whether their children will have the health care they need if they get sick...we have a moral obligation to our children to give them a healthy start in life." --Hillary Clinton http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1612

She is really reaching with this one! She is trying to sound like a caring mother instead of the heartless cyborg she is. Being the only female running for president, she really shouldn't have to go to such lengths to convince women to vote for her. We already know she is nothing more than an opportunistic power-monger, you would have to be extremely naive to fall into her poor acting.

Senator Hillary Clinton on Energy Conservation

2007-05-10T16:15:00.001-07:00

As she talks about her ideas on home-grown energy and energy conservation, I almost feel like if she were elected we won't have a choice in any of these matters.

Just imagine, the entire country forbidden from running their vaccuums or washing laudry between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm. Hypothetically, if this were to happen, would we be fined if we did not follow these orders? Perhaps, we will all have that 1984 video playing in our homes.

We live in America, and if we want to pay our energy bill after running our appliances at peak hours, we have that right. Just imagine that right being taken away.

The Post-Debate Hillary

2007-05-10T15:13:00.000-07:00

It was just last week that polls showed Obama leading in the Democratic primaries, but now after Democratic and Republican debates Clinton is showing an up to 18% lead in many polls. http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20070509/cm_rcp/marist_poll_clinton_18points_a

Along with these rising polls, Hillary has been getting several endorsements from people such as Governors Corzine, Spitzer, and O'Malley. So, it looks like she is officially the front-runner. I just hope when it is time to decide no one forgets what it was like the last time we had a Clinton in the White House.

Mrs. Self-Righteous criticizes response to Hurricane Katrina

2007-05-07T21:57:00.000-07:00

At the National Conference of Black Mayors, Clinton said that Bush's response to the massive hurricane was a display of "incompetence." I suppose she would have personally flown down there and evacuated every single person from the Gulf Coast with her own private jet.

She tries to make it sound like this region has been slow to recover because Bush doesn't like black people. I don't think it was President Bush who denied help from the Red Cross, or failed to warn any Southern citizens what was to come. Next she will try and say that the president conjured the hurricane himself with black magic.

http://www.hillaryproject.com

Repealing Bush's Authority

2007-05-07T15:38:00.000-07:00

Rarely do wars run smoothly and quickly, the war in Iraq is no exception. Of course Hillary Clinton has proposed that Congress repeal the authority to "wage" war on Iraq. She did vote to invade Iraq nearly five years ago, but has since changed her mind with the tide.

Hillary has proven that she is not strong enough to be our president. Even if this war was a mistake (which none of the people in the military I know believe it to be), a strong leader would recognize it and see it through to a positive end. There are no take-backs in war.

Her proposal is weak. If we bail out now, we bail on our country and on Iraq.

She goes on and on about her support for our military, but it seems to me she wants to lower the morale of our troops. Since we cannot give back the American lives that have been taken in this endeavor, we need to honor them by being successful.

She knows so little outside of her privileged, upper-class, liberal world. How could she take on the job of commander-in-chief?

Hillary works with Bono to raise our taxes....

2007-05-01T15:00:00.000-07:00

Yes, this will inevitably happen if our country gives a $10 billion global fund "to provide education to millions of children in Africa and elsewhere." This group of lawmakers Clinton has alligned herself with also believes that these forcefully taken tax dollars "would go a long way toward improving the country's international standing, and reducing the threat of terrorism."

First of all, let's focus on our country's educational system rather than it's international standing before we try to fix ignorance abroad. Second, I think it's radical Islam and the hatred of America, and not a yearning for an education that spawns terrorists.

Return of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy

2007-04-27T08:47:00.001-07:00

She can't honestly believe her theories on the vast right-wing conspiracy. First conservatives cooked-up the Monica Lewinsky scandal, hinder democratic votes and then jam up polling places where minorities and young people vote. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17593375/

What is next? Conservatives have caused "global warming" just to make liberals sound stupid? Obviously, we don't have to try too hard to do that!

Woman in Charge

2007-04-26T17:03:00.001-07:00

She seems to be pointing and scolding like a nasty school-teacher jamming her fingers into your chest.

Hillary is only a senator, and she talks to Americans like we are ignorant subordinates who she can only save by screaming condescendingly. Imagine if she were president!

There is nothing worse than a bitter, controlling woman. Just because Bill puts up with it, doesn't mean that we have to. How would you like to see this for four years?

Roaming Ambassador

2007-04-22T22:28:00.000-07:00

If elected, Hillary says she would use her husband as a "cheerleader" to get the "people around the world feeling better about our country." Wasn't it people like Hillary and Bill Clinton who have belittled our country, thereby encouraging other nations to hate us? Why would we care how the rest of the world feels about us anyway? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267723,00.html

Of course, this could just be another instance of Hillary holding the whip over Bill.

Hillary, the middle-class savior

2007-04-22T18:49:00.000-07:00

While campaigning in Iowa this weekend, the presidential candidate said that "we need to get back to the rich beginning to pay their fair share." http://usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-04-21-clinton-iowa_N.htm

So, she wants to increase taxes for the wealthy, yet she mentions nothing about lowering taxes for the middle class. Now I don't want to see government deficits, but I don't like seeing government surpluses under democratic leadership. If the government has a budget surplus, that tells me that we are being taxed too much. We certainly aren't going to be getting any of that money back with another Clinton in office.

The Clinton Squad Expands

2007-04-21T19:30:00.000-07:00

Hillary has tried to center herself on several issues in an attempt to gain support for the election. But she doesn't seem very moderate when she is endorsed by homosexual activists, the abortion lobby, and most recently, Playboy's Hugh Hefner. I fear for the future of America's families being led by a commander-in-chief who would have to cater to these special interest groups. http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07041906.html

The New Image

2007-04-19T22:42:00.000-07:00

So Hillary is trying to shrug off her heartless, frigidly robotic image for a relate-able, all-American image.

Well, good luck with that. Those of us with a half-way decent memory can recall her selfish, eat-your-beating-heart-out-with-a-knife-and-fork ways. She has not changed, and she never will. She will handle our beloved country the way she handles her marriage, with disregard and self-concern.

She does not care about us average Americans, and anyone who thinks so is fooling themselves.

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban

2007-04-19T19:00:00.000-07:00

"This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Today's decision blatantly defies the Court's recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito." --Hillary Clinton 4/18/2007

What about the innocent baby? This is not as wishy-washy as the morning after pill, which I also oppose, this is crushing a birth! Yet she believes this ruling is an "erosion of our constitutional rights"?!

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/blog

Just how low will she go?

2007-04-17T23:53:00.000-07:00

After Imus's "nappy headed hos" remark, of course Hillary had her fair share of jabs. But how many people question her holding a major fundraiser at rap composer, Timbaland's home in Miami? I am sure that she finds it very easy to disregard all of the disgusting lyrics Timbaland has produced when she thinks about the money she raised at his home.

Perhaps we could start keeping a "Character" graph, charting her ethical dilemmas and deceitful doings.

Should Bill advise Hill?

2007-04-16T23:45:00.000-07:00

Former President Clinton has not missed an opportunity to campaign for his wife at every chance he gets. Last Saturday in San Francisco Clinton talked about how our country needs a new, improved and more expansive health care system.

I wonder what programs he would encourage Hillary to cut from her hypothetical, more "cost-effective" government in order to support his larger, less "immoral" health care system.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/14/BAG7BP8VJV3.DTL

Government Reform Plan

2007-04-14T23:42:00.000-07:00

In her speech at St. Anselm College, Hillary preached about reforming the government and saving the taxpayers between $10 and $18 billion a year. Is she serious?! How often do democrats actually decrease spending? The last thing a liberal female in a position of power will do is trim the fat.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1444

Clinton Adopts Southern Accent - neocon version

2007-04-13T23:36:00.001-07:00

How can someone who changes from state to state be steadfast enough to lead our country?

She Wants to Improve Our Military

2007-04-12T23:33:00.000-07:00

Evidently Clinton is trying to improve medical treatment and support for our military. She probably just wants to add more staff to filter through the injured and sick. The last thing any military hospital needs is a thicker bureaucratic structure weighing it down.

Universal Preschool

2007-04-10T22:45:00.000-07:00

Access to universal preschool gives "a potential competitive advantage for us" and gives children a better chance later in school, Clinton described her goal of a universal preschool program to a group of admirers in Iowa City. http://www.press-citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article

Sure, let's have taxpayers pay for even more childcare and mediocre education. If Clinton is attempting to improve our society scholastically, perhaps she should focus on improving the system we have through school choice and encouraging the decent educators we have, instead of expanding the deteriorating system so few are satisfied with.

Hillary the Feminist

2007-04-07T11:22:00.000-07:00

We all know that Hillary about as far left as you can get, yet in her quest for the title "Madam President" she is showing very little backbone, placing herself cautiously in the center on several issues.

This shows that she has only gotten where she is because of her husband. Feminists cling to her simply because she is a woman, not for her bold and new stance in politics.

She is not unique, she is not a trailblazer. Sorry ladies, I have my doubts that she is truly a woman.