Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Attacks
Soon, Barack Obama will have all of his dirty secrets drug out, even worse than his relationship and shared ideas with close friend and vocal backer Rev. Wright. And of course Hillary Clinton's lack of executive experience, shady cover-ups and mysterious deaths associated with her family will be unearthed again. As frustrating and difficult as this may be for some, especially the candidates...I say...Let the good times roll!
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Congratulations Hillary!
I do wish Obama luck through this battle, though he is completely undeserving of the position for which he is running, but so is Hillary. I am looking for someone with experience, and I just haven't found that candidate yet. If any of you can recommend someone, please let me know.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Super Tuesday

Neither candidate has the defense experience to lead us out of the Middle East succesfully, neither has had long enough experience in the government to get the things we really need, and neither has the real experience in the economy to thwart whatever "disasters" may be coming. What exactly do either of these candidates have experience with? Is is worthy of leading our country?
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Can Bill be Harnessed?
Yes, many people are criticising Bill because they want the Clinton slew to make way for Obama. These are the people who think it is more important to elect the first black president, rather than the first female president. Of course, my main bone to pick with these people is that they should pick the most qualified person for the job, not simply to try and achieve some new quota or establish presidential affirmative action.
In my opinion, the reasons Bill is out there so hard for Hill are selfish, not patriotic or supportive. He wants the prestige, he wants the money, and most importantly, he wants to be able to sleep with the most powerful woman in the world...good luck Bill, isn't she celibate?
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Hillary made a funny
Thursday, January 3, 2008
Iowa Caucuses

Friday, September 21, 2007
If VP Cheney is Darth Vader, Who is Hillary Clinton?
Hillary would clearly be the Sarlacc in the Great Pit of Carkoon (the sand pit that eats Jaba the Hut's victims in Return of the Jedi). If this is some sort of joke, it is a very poor one. Either she is trying to win over Star Wars geeks (like myself) or she is just an idiot. At least Darth Vader was a good guy in his youth (as Anakin Skywalker), and in the end when he killed Emperor Palpatine. Has she ever been "good"?
What a moron. I can't decide what pisses me off more, a statement like this or her pandering southern accent.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
HillaryCare: Part Deux
Here are a few details on Hillary's new universal health care plan. My first problem is with "requiring" people to be insured. What will happen to those who don't want insurance? One thing that most Americans have in common is that they don't want to be forced to do anything.
I think that it is blatantly obvious that our country cannot afford universal health care and that her proposed budget for it cannot work. I would rather hear her detailed plan on saving Social Security, before she adds to the benefits of being American. I am very sympathetic to those who are uninsured, especially those who really need coverage. I have been without health care with Type 1 diabetes, it is not easy. Sacrifices and changes must be made, but I would not ask for everyone else to pay for my problems. There are entirely too many people who do not want to pay for the rest of the country's health care. If Hillary is elected, this plan will implode. So keep on researching, maybe in 15 more years she will have the right answer.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Hillary's View on Outsourcing
These conflicting statements and seemingly un-American views have delayed her obtaining an endorsement that would normally be given unquestionably and without hesitation to the front running Democrat. But Labour unions are withholding their endorsements until she can give a clear position on outsourcing.
Though Clinton prides herself (or at least her image) on being for the American people and providing them with jobs and services, she said in 2005 in New Delhi, "There is no way to legislate against reality. Outsourcing will continue... We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences." So, she is going to provide universal healthcare, preschool, affordable higher education, a cure for cancer and a slew of other things (which will either never happen or destroy our country when put into place), but she can't do anything about keeping American jobs for Americans, in America. Its amazing the things she can and cannot do!
Her conflicting opinions were displayed earlier this year when she told students in New Hampshire that she hated "seeing US telemarketing jobs done in remote locations far, far from our shores."
Whatever happened to the days when politicians said they were either for or against something and just stuck with it?
Friday, September 14, 2007
Giuliani Challenges Clinton

Thursday, September 13, 2007
Clinton Campaign to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu
This FoxNews video claims that the Hillary Camp. had been warned of the corruption of Norman Hsu, but the Clintons are not ones to pass judgement on corrupt individuals. Hsu is the norm to them, not an exception. But now Hillary's campaign will be returning $850,000 raised from individual donors by Hsu.
The Clinton '08 campaign has said that after returning these donations, they "will accept their contributions and ask them to confirm for the (campaign's) records that they are form their own personal funds." Of course Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson also said that "the campaign will vigorously review its fundraisers, including thorough criminal background checks, in the future." (click here to see article)
I just can't wait to see how many of these original donors actually re-give their gifts to the corrupt Clinton machine.
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Hillary's Letter to President Bush
As you prepare to address the nation tomorrow, I write to request that you seize the opportunity and offer the American people a candid assessment of the challenges that we continue to face in Iraq and offer a change in course to your failing strategy.
Over the past two days, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker have testified before Congress about the current situation in Iraq. General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker both have long and distinguished careers in service to our nation and in their testimony, they tried to put the best possible face on the difficult situation that we confront in Iraq.
In their testimony, however, General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker could not mask the fact that the ostensible goal for increasing U.S. troops in Iraq earlier this year - to create the "space" for Iraqi political reconciliation - has not been met. And indeed, serious concerns have been raised about many of the metrics cited by General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker in support of their assertion that progress is being made in Iraq.
General Petraeus testified that he has proposed a decrease of five combat brigades in Iraq by July/August 2008 and press reports have suggested that you plan to announce your acceptance of this recommendation when you address the nation tomorrow evening. However, if completed, these troop reductions would merely bring troop levels in Iraq back to the levels before you announced the "surge" in January of this year. Moreover, as was discussed during General Petraeus's testimony, troop levels in Iraq must decrease by this amount in order to avoid extending Army deployments beyond 15 months and straining our military even further.
What you are planning to tell the American people tomorrow night is that one year from now, there will be the same number of troops in Iraq as there were one year ago. Mr. President, that is simply too little too late, and unacceptable to this Congress, and to the American people who have made clear their strong desire to bring our troops home, and end this war.
As Commander-in-Chief you have the authority and ability to greatly accelerate the redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq, and to bring so many more troops home so much faster. I strongly urge you to choose this course of action.
Mr. President, it has been nearly four and a half years since you landed on an aircraft carrier and stood before the American people under a banner that read "Mission Accomplished." Do not repeat that mistake on Thursday night. Do not misrepresent the facts about the situation on the ground. And do not portray an unavoidable reduction in U.S. troops to pre-surge levels that would occur anyway as a marker of success. Be candid with the American people. They deserve it.
Thank you for your consideration
Sincerely yours,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
This is Hillary's letter, posted today to President Bush, on her presidential campaign website. My first suggestion to Hillary would be, don't speak for the troops, you have no idea what they want, or what they are going through. Leave it to the people who have experience and know what the hell is going on over there to decide how to complete the mission. DO NOT call them liars!
My personal statement to Sen. Clinton is that there are a lot of troops (though she does not know of any) that welcome an extended assignment in Iraq. They know the benefits of succeeding over there; they don't want to have to go back, or to fight them here in two years time. And, this might be a more personal issue, but many of them, even those who aren't sure what the hell is going on, welcome the pay raise for working over there.
Long story short...get some real experience before you try and change the policy or attempt to discredit those who try to inform you.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Hillary Clinton Lacks Resolve After General Petraeus Speaks to Congress
"Our troops who have performed heroically and have done everything they've been asked to do in Iraq have no business refereeing an Iraqi civil war. It is up to the Iraqis to make the decisions as to how they will stabilize their own country...But I honestly believe that if the troops come out tomorrow, next year, five years or 10 years, because there is no military solution, if the Iraqis have not resolved their own internal problems, there is nothing we can do."
Though most of us informed citizens know that Hillary Clinton is as far left as Sean Penn, she continues to shift like a bowling ball on a pirate ship when it comes to Iraq. She is hesitant to condemn the noble work of our men in uniform because she does not want to be viewed as unpatriotic, not because she doesn't actually want to condemn it. I can only hope that her lack of stability on such issues will lose her the support of the "hug-a-Taliban" crazies from MoveOn.org and DailyKos.
For the people I know who have fought in Iraq, it would be an incredible and insulting mistake to put a waffler like Hillary in charge. Her statement shows her disregard for America's future and her inability to lead the greatest country in the world.
Saturday, September 8, 2007
Clinton Fundraising Fugitive Picked up in Colorado

Friday, September 7, 2007
Hillary's Thoughts on Bin Laden
So far she is ignoring that it even exists, most likely waiting for the official "It really is Bin Laden" stamp before she makes an official statement. That way she has time to research all angles on what she thinks people want to hear, instead of actually forming and expressing her own true feelings on the matter.
At least Thompson, though a recent arrival to the 2008 Presidential race, has given his feeling of this news on his website. So far, nothing from Hillary. If you have heard her reaction, please let me know!
Thursday, September 6, 2007
Hillary's New Hampshire Ad
Here is Hillary's latest ad, which sounds like more of the same..."I've got the experience...I'm going to get us out of Iraq, get better benefits for veterans, energy independence and universal healthcare." Yes, she would make all of this happen and we would not see more than 30% of our paychecks, and our economy and world standing will collapse.
Since I know that she will not be able to do any of this, let alone breathe in the White House, without raising taxes, I would like to see a detailed plan of how she will make this happen. The introduction of the ad says that she has spent her life fighting for all of these things and all of the American people. I was under the impression that she had spent her life covering for her husband and manipulating their actions to benefit herself, I've never heard anything about her helping the rest of us. I can't wait to see her continue to try convince America that she cares as much as she says.
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Hillary Clinton's Fugitive Fundraiser
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Hillary Clinton on Gonzales Resignation
Upon Alberto Gonzales resignation yesterday, Hillary Clinton released her public statement. As she starts to lose her composure, this video shows Hillary's unbalanced and irrational behavior. This, along with many others urging for Gonzales's removal, solidifies my belief in their replacement of common sense with biased and charlatan principles.
In her press release she mentions Gonzales betraying his obligations and the trust of the American people. She does not mention her husband's firing of all 93 US Attorneys, but because Alberto Gonzales accepted resignations from only a fraction of that amount, he is partisan and unconstitutional. I won't even begin to preach about Bill and Hillary Clinton's shared presidency and its lacking of trust of the American people, that would be a novel.
For anybody who cares to do a little research, or simply switch on their memory button they will see that Hillary's statements are absurdly hypocritical.
The final statement from Clinton's press release is one that I find particularly senseless is:
"The second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is one more reminder that the President must appoint someone to lead the Department of Justice with the leadership and competence necessary to defend the Constitution."
What exactly is she trying to say here? Is this more manipulation of voters emotions? Probably. This definitely gets my "Huh?!" award.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Would Another Terrorist Attack Help the GOP?

Other Democrats have come out condemning Hillary's statement, being as it lacked tact, style and minimal intelligence. Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd Friday said, "Frankly, I find it tasteless to discuss political implications when talking about a potential terrorist attack on the United States." This ploy of hers does not surprise me in the least, being as she regularly throws low-blows and makes insensitive statements either before fully thinking them through, or just not caring what people will think when she says them. What I cannot understand is why she would keep putting her foot in her mouth like this, I thought that she was leaving that up to Obama.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Hillary vs. Karl
Hillary says that Karl Rove is "obsessed" with her, and that she knows how to beat the "Republican attack machine." These retorts sound spiteful and unoriginal, much like a teenage spat. These comments will only solidify people's doubts about electing an emotional, bitter, possibly hormonal and definitely irrational woman. She is ridiculous.
Her website even came out with a public argument, in the form of a press release, engaging Rove and attempting to discount his talking points with poll results. Shouldn't a presidential candidate be above this sort of scuffle. After all, when putting yourself in the largest spotlight in the world, aren't all challenges and attacks on the table?
This shows great weakness in Hillary Clinton, and her campaign controllers. As this personal debate heats up, we will see the darker side of Hillary more and more. Hillary shall be unmasked.