Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Attacks

I firmly believe that Hillary Clinton will bury this country, and I love the bitter attacks between her and Obama. Knowing that both of the Democratic presidential candidates would destroy the remaining liberties we have as citizens, liberals' present choice is between a man with little experience and strong anti-American ties, or a woman who "misspeaks" and lies. In all honesty, these are probably the least of their concerns, but these issues are forefront in the media, so that is what people are thinking about now.

Soon, Barack Obama will have all of his dirty secrets drug out, even worse than his relationship and shared ideas with close friend and vocal backer Rev. Wright. And of course Hillary Clinton's lack of executive experience, shady cover-ups and mysterious deaths associated with her family will be unearthed again. As frustrating and difficult as this may be for some, especially the candidates...I say...Let the good times roll!

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Congratulations Hillary!

Congrats on your success with Super Tuesday II! I suppose now is when the claws really come out, mostly towards Obama, but also towards McCain. I am truly excited to see how things proceed over the next couple of weeks, and just how vicious things will get. I am happy that Hillary Clinton is revived and still in the race, I just hope nobody gets hurt here. Of course, many of those skeletons (at least in the Clinton closet) were buried when her husband ran for president.

I do wish Obama luck through this battle, though he is completely undeserving of the position for which he is running, but so is Hillary. I am looking for someone with experience, and I just haven't found that candidate yet. If any of you can recommend someone, please let me know.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Super Tuesday

So Hillary made it through Super Tuesday, was anyone surprised? Yes, Obama still did well in places, but that will not stop the Clinton-engine-that-would. Even if Obama has the support of the masses, Hillary has masses of henchmen. There very well may be a Clinton-Obama ticket, people seem to like him and fear her. Isn't that how the mafia works? Hitmen, pay-offs, posterboys...yeah, that sounds right.

Neither candidate has the defense experience to lead us out of the Middle East succesfully, neither has had long enough experience in the government to get the things we really need, and neither has the real experience in the economy to thwart whatever "disasters" may be coming. What exactly do either of these candidates have experience with? Is is worthy of leading our country?

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Can Bill be Harnessed?

I cannot help but add my own remarks about former President Bill Clinton, since everybody else seems to be commenting on his catty, some believe inappropriate, campaigning. So he attacks Obama, of course...he bickers with reporters, yeah. What I don't understand is why people find this odd. If he was going to act regal and appropriate, wouldn't he have acted like that in the oval office? Why does anyone expect this decent behavior now? In my opinion (which even my own father disagrees with), this is one of the reasons why spouses of former presidents should not be allowed to run for president. The people who support Bill Clinton, will listen to what he says now. It will not matter that his wife is even less qualified than him to lead the free world. He said it, it must be so. The Clinton-lemmings will use this rationale.

Yes, many people are criticising Bill because they want the Clinton slew to make way for Obama. These are the people who think it is more important to elect the first black president, rather than the first female president. Of course, my main bone to pick with these people is that they should pick the most qualified person for the job, not simply to try and achieve some new quota or establish presidential affirmative action.

In my opinion, the reasons Bill is out there so hard for Hill are selfish, not patriotic or supportive. He wants the prestige, he wants the money, and most importantly, he wants to be able to sleep with the most powerful woman in the world...good luck Bill, isn't she celibate?

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Hillary made a funny

I hope that she felt like an idiot after this little display, because that is what she looked like. She is just too mechanical and impersonal to try and soften her edges in this way. Most people will not forget her true persona, but sadly, many are not smart enough to swish away these terrible attempts to chicken-soup her image. If her acting were a little better and her desperation to be more human a little less pathetic, perhaps even cynics like myself would fall for a few of these far-reaching antics. But, I don't think that is going to happen any time soon.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Iowa Caucuses

Did Hillary cry when she first heard that she was the third choice as Democratic presidential candidate in Iowa? What a sight that would be! But no, friends...I am sure she did not. She probably just punched the person standing nest to her, and then went on to punish her husband for inadequate support.

In all likelihood, she will probably still win the overall nomination, unfortunately. Though I do not agree with Obama's inexperience, I absolutely cannot stand the Clinton corruption. Oh, how I would have loved to be a fly on the wall when the Clinton camp got this news! But I will have to accept the images in my mind, because it seems like the news, or at least MSNBC, is throwing out a pillow for Clinton to land on. She has been getting bowed down to by the Chris Matthews crowd.

I would love to see the rest of the country show similar results to Iowa, and tell the world just how unlikeable Hillary Clinton is. She is corrupt, deceitful and abrasive...let's push that!

Friday, September 21, 2007

If VP Cheney is Darth Vader, Who is Hillary Clinton?

Hillary would clearly be the Sarlacc in the Great Pit of Carkoon (the sand pit that eats Jaba the Hut's victims in Return of the Jedi). If this is some sort of joke, it is a very poor one. Either she is trying to win over Star Wars geeks (like myself) or she is just an idiot. At least Darth Vader was a good guy in his youth (as Anakin Skywalker), and in the end when he killed Emperor Palpatine. Has she ever been "good"?

What a moron. I can't decide what pisses me off more, a statement like this or her pandering southern accent.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

HillaryCare: Part Deux

Here are a few details on Hillary's new universal health care plan. My first problem is with "requiring" people to be insured. What will happen to those who don't want insurance? One thing that most Americans have in common is that they don't want to be forced to do anything.

I think that it is blatantly obvious that our country cannot afford universal health care and that her proposed budget for it cannot work. I would rather hear her detailed plan on saving Social Security, before she adds to the benefits of being American. I am very sympathetic to those who are uninsured, especially those who really need coverage. I have been without health care with Type 1 diabetes, it is not easy. Sacrifices and changes must be made, but I would not ask for everyone else to pay for my problems. There are entirely too many people who do not want to pay for the rest of the country's health care. If Hillary is elected, this plan will implode. So keep on researching, maybe in 15 more years she will have the right answer.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Hillary's View on Outsourcing

In her pursuit of money and power, Hillary has traded favors for funds with an Indian constituency, who have pledged to raise around $5 million for her 2008 presidential run. The Clintons (during their eight years in office) approved grants to Indian-American advocacy groups which were used to outsource jobs from the U.S. to India, and more recently Sen. Clinton has backed raising the cap for annual visas from the current 65,000 to 115,000.

These conflicting statements and seemingly un-American views have delayed her obtaining an endorsement that would normally be given unquestionably and without hesitation to the front running Democrat. But Labour unions are withholding their endorsements until she can give a clear position on outsourcing.

Though Clinton prides herself (or at least her image) on being for the American people and providing them with jobs and services, she said in 2005 in New Delhi, "There is no way to legislate against reality. Outsourcing will continue... We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences." So, she is going to provide universal healthcare, preschool, affordable higher education, a cure for cancer and a slew of other things (which will either never happen or destroy our country when put into place), but she can't do anything about keeping American jobs for Americans, in America. Its amazing the things she can and cannot do!

Her conflicting opinions were displayed earlier this year when she told students in New Hampshire that she hated "seeing US telemarketing jobs done in remote locations far, far from our shores."

Whatever happened to the days when politicians said they were either for or against something and just stuck with it?

Friday, September 14, 2007

Giuliani Challenges Clinton

In a new ad released to FoxNews, Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani recaps Hillary Clinton's shifting positions on Iraq and charges her to condemn the MoveOn.org ad belittling Gen. Petraeus. Though Sen. Clinton has said little on these events, other than calling Gen. Petraeus a liar, perhaps this will spring her to action.

Will she openly condemn the ad? I doubt it. We are more likely to see her go the other way. But another, and possibly more achievable goal has been achieved with this ad....the gloves are off. They are both party front runners and both from New York, or at least representing New York. (Hillary is about as much of a New Yorker as I am!) Sen. Clinton will either stay silent until she concocts the a reasonably liberal retort, or she will lash out at Giuliani. So we shall wait on the edge of our seats to see how gracefully Hillary will absorb this blow, but I sure wouldn't mind seeing her implode.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Clinton Campaign to Return $850,000 Raised by Hsu

This FoxNews video claims that the Hillary Camp. had been warned of the corruption of Norman Hsu, but the Clintons are not ones to pass judgement on corrupt individuals. Hsu is the norm to them, not an exception. But now Hillary's campaign will be returning $850,000 raised from individual donors by Hsu.

The Clinton '08 campaign has said that after returning these donations, they "will accept their contributions and ask them to confirm for the (campaign's) records that they are form their own personal funds." Of course Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson also said that "the campaign will vigorously review its fundraisers, including thorough criminal background checks, in the future." (click here to see article)

I just can't wait to see how many of these original donors actually re-give their gifts to the corrupt Clinton machine.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Hillary's Letter to President Bush

Dear Mr. President:

As you prepare to address the nation tomorrow, I write to request that you seize the opportunity and offer the American people a candid assessment of the challenges that we continue to face in Iraq and offer a change in course to your failing strategy.

Over the past two days, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker have testified before Congress about the current situation in Iraq. General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker both have long and distinguished careers in service to our nation and in their testimony, they tried to put the best possible face on the difficult situation that we confront in Iraq.

In their testimony, however, General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker could not mask the fact that the ostensible goal for increasing U.S. troops in Iraq earlier this year - to create the "space" for Iraqi political reconciliation - has not been met. And indeed, serious concerns have been raised about many of the metrics cited by General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker in support of their assertion that progress is being made in Iraq.

General Petraeus testified that he has proposed a decrease of five combat brigades in Iraq by July/August 2008 and press reports have suggested that you plan to announce your acceptance of this recommendation when you address the nation tomorrow evening. However, if completed, these troop reductions would merely bring troop levels in Iraq back to the levels before you announced the "surge" in January of this year. Moreover, as was discussed during General Petraeus's testimony, troop levels in Iraq must decrease by this amount in order to avoid extending Army deployments beyond 15 months and straining our military even further.

What you are planning to tell the American people tomorrow night is that one year from now, there will be the same number of troops in Iraq as there were one year ago. Mr. President, that is simply too little too late, and unacceptable to this Congress, and to the American people who have made clear their strong desire to bring our troops home, and end this war.

As Commander-in-Chief you have the authority and ability to greatly accelerate the redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq, and to bring so many more troops home so much faster. I strongly urge you to choose this course of action.

Mr. President, it has been nearly four and a half years since you landed on an aircraft carrier and stood before the American people under a banner that read "Mission Accomplished." Do not repeat that mistake on Thursday night. Do not misrepresent the facts about the situation on the ground. And do not portray an unavoidable reduction in U.S. troops to pre-surge levels that would occur anyway as a marker of success. Be candid with the American people. They deserve it.

Thank you for your consideration

Sincerely yours,

Hillary Rodham Clinton


This is Hillary's letter, posted today to President Bush, on her presidential campaign website. My first suggestion to Hillary would be, don't speak for the troops, you have no idea what they want, or what they are going through. Leave it to the people who have experience and know what the hell is going on over there to decide how to complete the mission. DO NOT call them liars!

My personal statement to Sen. Clinton is that there are a lot of troops (though she does not know of any) that welcome an extended assignment in Iraq. They know the benefits of succeeding over there; they don't want to have to go back, or to fight them here in two years time. And, this might be a more personal issue, but many of them, even those who aren't sure what the hell is going on, welcome the pay raise for working over there.

Long story short...get some real experience before you try and change the policy or attempt to discredit those who try to inform you.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Hillary Clinton Lacks Resolve After General Petraeus Speaks to Congress

As should be expected, Sen. Clinton made a squishy response to Gen. David Petraeus's testimony yesterday. Most Democrats have come out with crazy left-wing remarks (such as, "Gen. Betray-us"-- which is disgusting), but not the pandering Hillary. In campaign mode she fails to take a firm position. In Boca Raton, FL yesterday she said,

"Our troops who have performed heroically and have done everything they've been asked to do in Iraq have no business refereeing an Iraqi civil war. It is up to the Iraqis to make the decisions as to how they will stabilize their own country...But I honestly believe that if the troops come out tomorrow, next year, five years or 10 years, because there is no military solution, if the Iraqis have not resolved their own internal problems, there is nothing we can do."

Though most of us informed citizens know that Hillary Clinton is as far left as Sean Penn, she continues to shift like a bowling ball on a pirate ship when it comes to Iraq. She is hesitant to condemn the noble work of our men in uniform because she does not want to be viewed as unpatriotic, not because she doesn't actually want to condemn it. I can only hope that her lack of stability on such issues will lose her the support of the "hug-a-Taliban" crazies from MoveOn.org and DailyKos.

For the people I know who have fought in Iraq, it would be an incredible and insulting mistake to put a waffler like Hillary in charge. Her statement shows her disregard for America's future and her inability to lead the greatest country in the world.

Saturday, September 8, 2007

Clinton Fundraising Fugitive Picked up in Colorado

Major Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu was picked up in Colorado yesterday, and is expected to be extradited back to California to face his original 1992 fraud conviction, as well as his more recent unlawful flight charge. What a moron.

Don't worry Hill, he'll be back in time to raise you a few million more!

Friday, September 7, 2007

Hillary's Thoughts on Bin Laden

What are Hillary's thoughts on this most recent tape of Osama Bin Laden? Will this sway her opinion on Iraq once more? We all know that much less significant things have changed her position in the past.

So far she is ignoring that it even exists, most likely waiting for the official "It really is Bin Laden" stamp before she makes an official statement. That way she has time to research all angles on what she thinks people want to hear, instead of actually forming and expressing her own true feelings on the matter.

At least Thompson, though a recent arrival to the 2008 Presidential race, has given his feeling of this news on his website. So far, nothing from Hillary. If you have heard her reaction, please let me know!

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Hillary's New Hampshire Ad

Here is Hillary's latest ad, which sounds like more of the same..."I've got the experience...I'm going to get us out of Iraq, get better benefits for veterans, energy independence and universal healthcare." Yes, she would make all of this happen and we would not see more than 30% of our paychecks, and our economy and world standing will collapse.

Since I know that she will not be able to do any of this, let alone breathe in the White House, without raising taxes, I would like to see a detailed plan of how she will make this happen. The introduction of the ad says that she has spent her life fighting for all of these things and all of the American people. I was under the impression that she had spent her life covering for her husband and manipulating their actions to benefit herself, I've never heard anything about her helping the rest of us. I can't wait to see her continue to try convince America that she cares as much as she says.

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Hillary Clinton's Fugitive Fundraiser

Major "HillRaiser" Norman Hsu is again a wanted fugitive after skipping his court hearing today. Though he posted $2 million bail last week, he is off again just like he was in 1991 when facing the original grand theft charges. Nobody knows where Hsu has fled to, though we can all guess he is in China, or perhaps Hillary Clinton's basement. But Hillary says she knew nothing about her great HillRaiser's criminal past. It is odd that she has accepted such large contributions without getting any history of the person giving them. Either she is lying, or she is incompetent.

Let's first get this straight, Hsu did not infiltrate the Clinton lair to make her campaign look bad. These are the type of people who surround the Clintons. It is that simple. She is clumsily back-peddling from her association with Hsu by returning $23,000 she had collected from him for her presidential and senatorial campaigns, and HillPac (Hillary's political action committee).

There is something deeper and far more sinister to this relationship that will probably come out in the end, unless Hillary has her way, she has always been aggressive when it comes to covering up scandals. This is certainly not the first fundraising scandal Hillary Clinton has been caught up in, and it will not be the last. There is not a strand of moral fiber in this candidate's body.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Hillary Clinton on Gonzales Resignation


Upon Alberto Gonzales resignation yesterday, Hillary Clinton released her public statement. As she starts to lose her composure, this video shows Hillary's unbalanced and irrational behavior. This, along with many others urging for Gonzales's removal, solidifies my belief in their replacement of common sense with biased and charlatan principles.

In her press release she mentions Gonzales betraying his obligations and the trust of the American people. She does not mention her husband's firing of all 93 US Attorneys, but because Alberto Gonzales accepted resignations from only a fraction of that amount, he is partisan and unconstitutional. I won't even begin to preach about Bill and Hillary Clinton's shared presidency and its lacking of trust of the American people, that would be a novel.

For anybody who cares to do a little research, or simply switch on their memory button they will see that Hillary's statements are absurdly hypocritical.

The final statement from Clinton's press release is one that I find particularly senseless is:

"The second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is one more reminder that the President must appoint someone to lead the Department of Justice with the leadership and competence necessary to defend the Constitution."

What exactly is she trying to say here? Is this more manipulation of voters emotions? Probably. This definitely gets my "Huh?!" award.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Would Another Terrorist Attack Help the GOP?

Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton told a New Hampshire crowd on Thursday that, "If certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world. So I think I'm the best of the Democrats to deal with that." Check out this CNN article for more information.

Other Democrats have come out condemning Hillary's statement, being as it lacked tact, style and minimal intelligence. Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd Friday said, "Frankly, I find it tasteless to discuss political implications when talking about a potential terrorist attack on the United States." This ploy of hers does not surprise me in the least, being as she regularly throws low-blows and makes insensitive statements either before fully thinking them through, or just not caring what people will think when she says them. What I cannot understand is why she would keep putting her foot in her mouth like this, I thought that she was leaving that up to Obama.


The truth is, the GOP would only benefit from another terrorist attack because Americans feel safer and more confident in their leadership and resolve, especially when it comes to defense. Does that mean that any of the Republican candidates would like another attack to boost their position for the upcoming election? Absolutely not. This angle of Sen. Clinton's is despicable. Of course, the far left will continue to fall at her feet, but at least the moderates are taking a step back from the Hillary bandwagon for now. I am sure that they will return to her, but if she keeps on making stupid remarks like this, her support will thin out.


Let us all remember that terrorism is not a political tool to be employed for maximum impact on voters. It is a reality, and a dangerous threat throughout the world.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Hillary vs. Karl

Since announcing that he will be stepping down at the end of the month, Karl Rove has publicly challenged Hillary Clinton's stance on different issues and her presidential campaign. Rove believes that Hillary will be the Democrat's nominee and stated that the public opinion of her is negative. For related articles click here.

Hillary says that Karl Rove is "obsessed" with her, and that she knows how to beat the "Republican attack machine." These retorts sound spiteful and unoriginal, much like a teenage spat. These comments will only solidify people's doubts about electing an emotional, bitter, possibly hormonal and definitely irrational woman. She is ridiculous.

Her website even came out with a public argument, in the form of a press release, engaging Rove and attempting to discount his talking points with poll results. Shouldn't a presidential candidate be above this sort of scuffle. After all, when putting yourself in the largest spotlight in the world, aren't all challenges and attacks on the table?

This shows great weakness in Hillary Clinton, and her campaign controllers. As this personal debate heats up, we will see the darker side of Hillary more and more. Hillary shall be unmasked.